Talk:Toxic SP (TCG): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
Politoed666 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Well, we could put it down as a deck archetype...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 20:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | :Well, we could put it down as a deck archetype...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 20:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I actually thought of that. Problem is that it's really not. An archetype is usually a deck generated by players. It ''can'' be out of a guide, but generally, it's not. Biggest problem with this is that there are far better SP Toolbox lists out there, and I plan to write an article on those. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 20:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:40, 1 February 2010
This really shouldn't be referred to as a "theme deck." I'm considering merging this with the article on Galactic's Conquest, unless anyone objects or has a better idea. --ニョロトノ666 20:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well, we could put it down as a deck archetype...--Shiningpikablu252 20:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- I actually thought of that. Problem is that it's really not. An archetype is usually a deck generated by players. It can be out of a guide, but generally, it's not. Biggest problem with this is that there are far better SP Toolbox lists out there, and I plan to write an article on those. --ニョロトノ666 20:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
