Talk:First partner Pokémon/Featured article candidate

Support (6)

• This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --ケンジのガール 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
• The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--Wowy 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
• After going through it for a while, I've decided that it does indeed deserve to be a Featured Article. It's very informative.--Kkllnn blastoise 23:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
• Support; This article is good well written "ehh.." trivia but still a good article.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 07:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• I think the article is quite interesting, and it is about most aspects of Pokémon (Games, Anime, Ect...) Elliot 08:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Object (6)

• While I do like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --electAbuzzzz ^(TALK) 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
• Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. Aura-Knight 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
• Agreed. It's good, but too much of a list to be considered featured. Arceus548 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
• There are some problems I noticed with it too - such as the fact it still claimed that Jessie's Arbok was a gift from Giovanni, while that comment was removed from the main article years ago. If that error was still in there, I wouldn't be surprised if there are other little errors it has that I didn't see. If this is to become a featured article, it needs to be less of a list, and it should have a thorough clean up. Right now, it's not featured material. Satosuke 14:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
• Agree with electAbuzzzz here.--Diby
• Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. User:Dusknoir477 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC)