User talk:Jioruji Derako/MoveInfobox

Discussion

U LIEK?!!

Yes, I do.

1. I like, however, Ghost may look too similar to Shadow... ^ht14
2. But there's still the dottyborder. Looks... eh. TTEchidna 21:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

No, I don't.

1. (no name here)

I think you're amazing, but I have some suggestions.

1. I'm not sure if I like the dotted borders. It looks too pixelly. I like all the nested curves though. — Laoris _(Blah) 16:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Ditto on the dotted borders. And in some cases {{light color}} text on {{type color}} background can be illegible. Otherwise it is purrrdy. — THE TROM — 20:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
3. The redirect for '''[[Pokémon battles|Battles]]''', '''[[Pokémon Contests|Contests]]''' and '''[[Pokémon Super Contests|Super Contests]]''' change to '''[[Pokémon battle|Battles]]''', '''[[Pokémon Contest|Contests]]''' and '''[[Pokémon Super Contest|Super Contests]]'''. It's great. =] --×Kevzo8 09:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

   Fixed. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 14:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

4. "Type" and "Category" don't seem to stay centered when an image stretches the box... and the "Shadow" version calls up a non-existant color template Template:Shadow textcolor but other than that it's incredible. Oh yeah, and the dot borders... not that great.--MisterE13 21:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

   Yeah, I'll see about working some fixes into the template. Dotted borders are gone; I'm not sure about the non-centering issue with Type and Category, do you have an example for that one? And I'll work in a fix for the Shadow textcolor issue as well. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 14:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

   'Tis a leetle messy, but I tweaked the template so it don't attempt to color the text when categorized as "Shadow" (since that isn't visible if it's a Shadow move anyway). Should work. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 15:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

   "Type" can be seen anywhere here in the battle section. By Category, I mean Contest category. All the examples on this page demonstrate it. I could probably fix it myself if you can't see what I mean.--MisterE13 02:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   Yeah, I don't see it. Go ahead and fix it, that sounds like the best way to explain it. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 15:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   I tried, you can check the history to see what I did and maybe fix it.--MisterE13 17:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   What browser do you use, and what screen resolution do you have? It might be an issue only in a particular browser or resolution, which is why I'm not seeing it. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 19:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   Internet explorer. Don't know about the resolution. If you can't fin d how to fix it, it doesn't detreact that much from this amazing template.--MisterE13 22:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   Yeh, that explains it. Internet Explorer is probably the worst browser when it comes to trying to do any styling, since it eats .CSS and craps gibberish (I just made that up, but it's close enough). Either way, I still managed to "dumb down" the template to work, so IE users don't have any issues. It should be fine on your end now. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 23:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   Sheer perfection!--MisterE13 02:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

   Since Shadow moves can be physical or special (like in Gen IV) Should we add similar notes to that effect?--MisterE13 02:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

   (resetting indent) Hmm, the template supports damage category... it just needs to be allowed to display there. Technically none of the Shadow moves are in a damage category right, they just go by Attack or Sp. Attack, right. I don't really want to use the same categories for that reason, but perhaps list it in the move's effect section instead. I'm not entirely clear on how those moves work in that regard. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 04:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Previews

• See here