Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Pikachu (Pokémon)

Support (7)

  • This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--Alex726contributions 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Maybe Bulbasaur? 梅子 02:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--Alex726contributions 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--でんのう Zえんし 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • This is my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) Ataro 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great trivia and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. Pokemaster97 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Altough I think the trivia section is a little messy. I'm for.-- Gagaromamah, Your Little Monster 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. It is without a question the best article about a Pokémon on here. The Trivia section seems OK to me, and if it doesn't, nothing that a few edits can't fix. The Mascot of the series deserves a place in there. --Shinytwo 18:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Object (3)

Is it better now?--でんのう Zえんし 09:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Other comments