Talk:Ash's Goodra
Shouldn't we put that Goomy may evolve in a future episode as the opening shows Goomy evolving into Goodra.Pichu911 12:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Is this trivia worthy?
Is it worth mentioning that Goomy is Ash's first pure Dragon-type Pokémon? --PKMNAdventurer (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- I would say no, because this is Ash's second Dragon-type Pokémon not fifth or something like that so it isn't that significant. StephenWalker97 (talk) 17:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
PKMNAdventurer Stated that Goomy is Ash Full non Secondary Dragon Type Typing
Ability?
How do we know that Goomy's ability is Hydtration? Its body drying out is the reason why it needs water which is in its Pokedex entry.Pichu911 21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Although its already been removed, unless Ash or one of his friends mentions that it being healed is due to Hydration (I don't understand Japanese so I don't know), we shouldn't add it until its confirmed. StephenWalker97 (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Data Broadcast
We got data broadcast for Sligoo finally so Goomy's rapid evolution was true so shouldn't we now protect the page and put that Goomy is set to evolve in a future episode.Pichu911 00:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- We know it's going to evolve, we don't know when. Until the episode in question has been announced, it will stay unprotected. I've semi protected for now, just in case other users want to add information about it for future episodes.--ForceFire 03:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Actually the broadcast data was for XY065 so we actually know when it is going to evolve.Pichu911 04:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Protection
Is it really worth putting up a full protection for this page, I know its because of an user making bad and presumptive edits, but shouldn't we wait until a preview like a magazine reveals the episode number (I think an earlier post mentioned it to be XY065 or something) StephenWalker97 (talk) 19:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- I gave users a chance to edit this page, but a few users are really impatient, thus forcing me to fully protect this page.--ForceFire 02:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I didn't know that speculation was that bad on pages with future spoilers, but I see what you're saying StephenWalker97 (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
