Template talk:ItemInfobox/head

Comments

IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —darklordtrom 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I only just noticed this comment. I suppose that is a good point; the rest of the page is sorted chronologically as well (with item descriptions and item locations). I think I will flip it. --SnorlaxMonster 13:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Mainspacing the articles

If the only thing preventing it is the mainspacing of the template itself, then perhaps it would be better to move the articles without it. SatoMew 18:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)