Talk:Bombirdier (Pokémon)
Google Translate says that the Japanese Name of Bombirdier's category translates to either "Lost Thing" or "Dropped Item" Pokemon. HenryWong122 (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I looked at other translation sites and dictionaries and it does seem to be like a pun on that phrase or something. I don't want to just put "Dropped Item mon" on the category table, though. Idk, maybe someone else can figure how to fill that out (the category page still has a few cells blank). Anzasquiddles (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well, it's already the "Item Drop" Pokémon in English, so it being the "Dropped Item" Pokémon in Japanese makes sense. HenryWong122 (talk) 22:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
STAB
With the introduction of Bombirdier's Signature Ability and Terastallizing, Bombirdier has four STABs, Flying, Dark, Rock (via ability) and then any of the other Tera types. Dhelmise is the only other Pokémon to be able to do this if it was in the game. HenryWong122 (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, didn't even realize. I thought no mon would have this kinda deal since Dhelmise isn't in SV, but i forgot Bombirdier also has a similar ability. Will add to the page. Anzasquiddles (talk) 22:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is really stretching the phrase STAB, how is boosting moves that are not the "same type" considered STAB? Terastallizing would count because the user becomes the same type. But it's not STAB if it's Steelworker, Dragon's Maw, Transistor, and the Pokémon is not the same type. Pikiwyn talk 05:29, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I mean, there's a reason i worded it specifically in the way i did on the main page. "50% boost in four types at once: two via STABs, one via ability, and one via Tera". Anzasquiddles (talk) 06:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is really stretching the phrase STAB, how is boosting moves that are not the "same type" considered STAB? Terastallizing would count because the user becomes the same type. But it's not STAB if it's Steelworker, Dragon's Maw, Transistor, and the Pokémon is not the same type. Pikiwyn talk 05:29, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Bombirdier's Origin
It has come to my attention that one of the possible origins mentioned for Bombirdier is a Fiat BR.20 Cicogna, an Italian military bomber aircraft used by the at the time fascists Italy, and used by the far right during the Spanish Civil War to massacre the opposition and civilians. Such theory, clearly thrown there without much critical thinking, suggests that someone designing Pokémon would decidedly pay homage to a vehicle associated with nazifascist massacres happening across Europe during the WWII. This, as one can imagine, is bafflingly absurd and gross for a series primarily aimed at children and young teenagers.
I do believe Bombirdier has origins loosely related to bomber planes, as its very name suggests (bombardier), but that specific airplane model has no major popular significance and is thrown there purely due to its nickname ("stork") and its extremely loose connections to Spain's history -- there are no physical similarities to Bombirdier or references that point directly to it in Dex entries, Pokémon species, etc.
It's known that some Pokémon have designs inspired by military artillary (Garchomp, Octillery, Dragapult's line, beta designs for Hydreigon line). The issue here isn't that it might be based on a military plane, it's the fact it's a plane associated with nazifascism authoritarianism and the tragedies that stemmed from it. And no, the Dark type does not justify this. To put this into perspective, this is almost as equivalent as someone proposing that a Poison-type Pokémon might be based on mustard gas or gas chambers, or that a Fire-type Pokémon would be based on 9/11 or Napalm. As someone that has lost family during the brutal Spanish Civil War, and has always heard relatives talking about its horrors, it deeply bothers me a lot how such irresponsible proposal was allowed on this site for so long.
I recently tried to get it removed, only for it to be reverted by Staff. Admittedly, one of the reasons I provided for the edit was because thought this was added due to a Pokétuber snowballing such such theory (it would not be the first time this happens), but as pointed out this was in the page before said video, and I stand corrected. But if anything, I feel like this makes matters even worse, considering the damage it might've caused by letting it be spread by Youtubers with millions of fairly young subscribers came from them likely reading this page. It's certainly strange to me how this site is so overtly concerned when it comes to users proposing popular culture franchises in Pokémon origins such as Godzilla or D&D, but consciously allows a proposal exalting Mussolini's military to stay.
In short, I'd like to, again, request for the removal of mentions of the Fiat BR.20 Cicogna. ExLight (talk) 00:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
