Talk:Water (type)
Attack Notes
should they be to the point, or fancy?
- Always attacks first
- The user lunges at the foe at a speed that makes it almost invisible. It is sure to strike first.
File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 02:16, 12 December 2007 (UT)
Centered?
Damage-dealing moves
| Name | Category | Contest | Power | Accuracy | PP | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqua Jet | File:PhysicalIC.gif | File:BeautyIC.gif | 40 | 100% | 20 | One foe | Always attacks first |
| Aqua Tail | File:PhysicalIC.gif | File:CuteIC.gif | 90 | 90% | 10 | One foe | The user attacks by swinging its tail as if it were a vicious wave in a raging storm. |
centered? or just leave them off to the right? File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 03:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- left?!?! thats not really an option.. File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 03:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah just leave it as it is, to the left. You do know which way is left and right. Right?File:Ani471MS.gifPokemaniac102File:AniEggMS.gif 03:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- yes, but im asking, put the damage/accuracy in the center or to the right? all the pages are to the right, and i was thinking about converting them. File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 03:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't look tacky in the right. Leave it. Tina δ♫ 03:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. Put them in the center.File:Ani471MS.gifPokemaniac102File:AniEggMS.gif 03:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't look tacky in the right. Leave it. Tina δ♫ 03:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- yes, but im asking, put the damage/accuracy in the center or to the right? all the pages are to the right, and i was thinking about converting them. File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 03:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- we have a conflict here. one says this, and the other says that. try looking at Electric and Water. also, could somone answer my question above about attack notes? File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 03:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- To the point for the attacks, and actually, center sounds good. Tina δ♫ 22:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- What she said. To the point and in the center. -File:Spr 3e 186.gifニョロトノ666File:Spr 3e 186.gif
- some moves have no secondary notes (like Surf) so, should they be left blank? File:Ani081MS.gifMAGNEDETHFile:Ani082MS.gifTALKFile:Ani462MS.gif 22:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
yes leave it blank. duh!Lilio 00:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Call it "No other effects". END. It's the Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links01:27 22 Jun 2008
- WHAT???!!!!Lilio3:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Look at the dates on the comment. You were replying to a seven-month-old conversation. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 07:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- WHAT???!!!!Lilio3:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Trivia
"There is at least one Pokémon of each type combination that has a 4x weakness to Water."
What does this mean?--Skaisdead 00:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- It means that in every type, there is a Pokémon that has a 4x weakness to water, though this isn't exactly true, cause Dragon and Grass are resistant to Water Chuck67322 20:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, it means that there is a Pokémon created with each of the type combinations that are 4x weak to Water. These are Rock/Ground (e.g. Onix), Fire/Rock (e.g. Magcargo) and Fire/Ground (e.g. Camerupt). There are no other type combinations with 4x weakness to Water. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 21:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- The same is true of Flying and Grass. What of it? --Skaisdead 00:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, it means that there is a Pokémon created with each of the type combinations that are 4x weak to Water. These are Rock/Ground (e.g. Onix), Fire/Rock (e.g. Magcargo) and Fire/Ground (e.g. Camerupt). There are no other type combinations with 4x weakness to Water. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 21:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Type combination trivia
Since it has been recently removed and re-added, I'v decided to bring this up here. The section above explains what the trivia should mean, but the current wording is ambiguous and could mean either the intended meaning, or that each type has a Pokémon which is double weak to water, which is, of course, incorrect.
Currently it reads There is at least one Pokémon of each type combination that has a double weakness to Water.
I'm unsure how to word it better. All I could come up with was For each possible type combination with a double weakness to Water there is at least one Pokémon with that type combination. However that sounds a bit too wordy.
Can anyone come up with something better? (i.e. isn't ambiguous, but isn't too wordy) Werdnae (talk) 06:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- "For each possible type combination with a double weakness to Water there is at least one Pokémon with that type combination. (examples: Ground/Rock, Geodude, Fire/Rock, Magcargo, Fire/Ground, Numel)" Or we could list them off, like:
- Ground/Rock, *insert Pokémon*
- Fire/Ground, *insert Pokémon*
And so on. It might be wordy, but if it works, it's fine. R.A. Hunter Blade 16:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
