Talk:Glaceon (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Serebii had all of the names and was going to reveal them one at a time. Then, somebody leaked the names and Serebii basically confirmed all of them. He's been right about all of the other English names. There's no reason to believe he made any mistakes here. Besides, if it's proven to be wrong, we can always change it. It's not that big of a deal. --[[User:PAK Man|PAK Man]] 16:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | :Serebii had all of the names and was going to reveal them one at a time. Then, somebody leaked the names and Serebii basically confirmed all of them. He's been right about all of the other English names. There's no reason to believe he made any mistakes here. Besides, if it's proven to be wrong, we can always change it. It's not that big of a deal. --[[User:PAK Man|PAK Man]] 16:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
::The problem Wikipedia has is with reliability of sources. Bulbapedia considers Serebii a reliable source for this so we have the articles at the English names. --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] 16:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:32, 28 March 2007
What part of "Do not misrepresent rumors, misconceptions or opinions as fact" do you not understand?!
Glaceon is thought to be the pokemons english name just because it is the ending of all the other Eevee evolutions,but that is RUMOR at this point and NOT FACT.Gatogirl
- Didn't Serebii confirm it as true? --PAK Man 16:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, we have had all the English names confirmed for a few weeks now. --FabuVinny 16:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Just because Serebii confermed it ti does not mean anything (see Wikipedia's article discussion to catch my drift)Gatogirl
- Serebii had all of the names and was going to reveal them one at a time. Then, somebody leaked the names and Serebii basically confirmed all of them. He's been right about all of the other English names. There's no reason to believe he made any mistakes here. Besides, if it's proven to be wrong, we can always change it. It's not that big of a deal. --PAK Man 16:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The problem Wikipedia has is with reliability of sources. Bulbapedia considers Serebii a reliable source for this so we have the articles at the English names. --FabuVinny 16:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
