User talk:Espeon360/Eeveelutions: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(New section: So...) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:Espeon360|.]] 18:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | [[User:Espeon360|.]] 18:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::Don't you see that this page is now categorized? Do you see any <code><nowiki>[[Category:User en]]</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>[[Category:User en-N]]</nowiki></code> when you click to edit the page (I mean besides these ones I just wrote)? It's the ''template'' that's doing that, because it has an <code><nowiki><includeonly></nowiki></code> tag in there that surrounds the categories that get included on all pages that use it. All templates also have a <code><nowiki><noinclude></nowiki></code> tag around the category that they themselves belong to, but the pages that use them should not. The coding for the {{template|p}} template has <code><nowiki><noinclude>[[Category:Link templates]]</noinclude></nowiki></code> so as to categorize [[Template:P]] as a link template, but not all of the 5000 pages that use it. This is what screws things up when people take template code into their userpages instead of just including the template. If I just copied the ''code'' for {{template|User Firefox}}, I would be categorized as a browser tag. I'm not a browser tag! I'm a Firefox user! '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">TTE</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#0000FF">chidna</span>]]''' 22:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | :::::Don't you see that this page is now categorized? Do you see any <code><nowiki>[[Category:User en]]</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>[[Category:User en-N]]</nowiki></code> when you click to edit the page (I mean besides these ones I just wrote)? It's the ''template'' that's doing that, because it has an <code><nowiki><includeonly></nowiki></code> tag in there that surrounds the categories that get included on all pages that use it. All templates also have a <code><nowiki><noinclude></nowiki></code> tag around the category that they themselves belong to, but the pages that use them should not. The coding for the {{template|p}} template has <code><nowiki><noinclude>[[Category:Link templates]]</noinclude></nowiki></code> so as to categorize [[Template:P]] as a link template, but not all of the 5000 pages that use it. This is what screws things up when people take template code into their userpages instead of just including the template. If I just copied the ''code'' for {{template|User Firefox}}, I would be categorized as a browser tag. I'm not a browser tag! I'm a Firefox user! '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">TTE</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#0000FF">chidna</span>]]''' 22:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
== So... == | |||
Um, question. Esp hasn't been back in about three months, and this page is ''still'' categorized as a Ground group Pokémon. Remove the offending portion? {{:User:TTEchidna/sig}} 05:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:45, 28 February 2008
You know that we already have and Eeveelutions page, right??? --File:Spr 3e 059.gifFile:Spr 3e 132.gifTheryguy512 File:Trozeiani025.gif 18:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- And that this page has autocategorized itself... again... C'mon, Esp. TTEchidna 20:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
| en | This user is a native speaker of English. |
|---|
on this page categorizes User talk:Espeon360/Eeveelutions as a native speaker of English. See? I have written no categories, but it's still categorizing for me. That's what the Pokémon infobox does: it autocategorizes the page by body size and egg group. TTEchidna 07:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
. 18:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Don't you see that this page is now categorized? Do you see any
[[Category:User en]]or[[Category:User en-N]]when you click to edit the page (I mean besides these ones I just wrote)? It's the template that's doing that, because it has an<includeonly>tag in there that surrounds the categories that get included on all pages that use it. All templates also have a<noinclude>tag around the category that they themselves belong to, but the pages that use them should not. The coding for the{{p}}template has<noinclude>[[Category:Link templates]]</noinclude>so as to categorize Template:P as a link template, but not all of the 5000 pages that use it. This is what screws things up when people take template code into their userpages instead of just including the template. If I just copied the code for{{User Firefox}}, I would be categorized as a browser tag. I'm not a browser tag! I'm a Firefox user! TTEchidna 22:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Don't you see that this page is now categorized? Do you see any
So...
Um, question. Esp hasn't been back in about three months, and this page is still categorized as a Ground group Pokémon. Remove the offending portion? User:TTEchidna/sig 05:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
