Talk:Marriland: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Reached the point where discussion warrants keeping) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
ADVERTISEMENTS ARE BAD! NO TO THIS PAGE{{Ani|493}}[[User:Darth Cookie Monster|<span style="color:#000000;">'''C '''</span>]]{{Ani|491}}[[User talk:Darth Cookie Monster|<span style="color:#000000;">''' Is'''</span>]]{{Ani|426}}[[User:Darth Cookie Monster/My Story|<span style="color:#000000;">'''for Cookie'''</span>]]{{Ani|473}} 01:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | ADVERTISEMENTS ARE BAD! NO TO THIS PAGE{{Ani|493}}[[User:Darth Cookie Monster|<span style="color:#000000;">'''C '''</span>]]{{Ani|491}}[[User talk:Darth Cookie Monster|<span style="color:#000000;">''' Is'''</span>]]{{Ani|426}}[[User:Darth Cookie Monster/My Story|<span style="color:#000000;">'''for Cookie'''</span>]]{{Ani|473}} 01:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 3 April 2008
ADVERTISEMENTS ARE BAD! NO TO THIS PAGEC Isfor Cookie 01:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really think it's an advertisement. It's just a crappily-made article with no redeeming qualities. --ニョロトノ666 01:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Don't forget, as well as deleting the main article, we need to delete the talk page also! MoldyOrange 02:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- dont we have Serebii.com as an artcle? MAGNEDETH 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I like this article. Not the quality of course (what's with having a Pokemon infobox), but Marriland is a well established site, and this is not advertising. There's other articles on useful sites, such as Serebii. I just cleaned it up. I vote it stays. Porygon-Z 02:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- dont we have Serebii.com as an artcle? MAGNEDETH 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
NO to deletion
I think we need to raise "awareness" of some pretty good websites like this. Plus, who cares if it's crappy, somebody will eventually clean it up and make it look better.
- We already have an article on Marriland Forums. We don't necessarily need a page on its webmaster. --PAK Man Talk 20:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)