User talk:Valentio: Difference between revisions
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Valentio (talk) to last revision by ArcToraphim Tag: Rollback |
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) →Blocked again: new section |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
I suggest that instead of being worried about removing content on the Pokemon world in relation to the real world article, you focus on adding things that may have been missed. If other people think it fits, just leave it alone, please. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 23:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC) | I suggest that instead of being worried about removing content on the Pokemon world in relation to the real world article, you focus on adding things that may have been missed. If other people think it fits, just leave it alone, please. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 23:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Blocked again == | |||
You're being quite unreasonable and acting in bad faith, as well as being aggressive. For the record, no you don't know SleepySheep's IP (because I checked, they don't match) and the account is, in fact, a week old (I checked that, too), so your suspicions are unfounded and if you continue to harass them or KryptonLion about being sockpuppets when you come back, your return will likely be short lived. If you come back and return to the discussion of Paldea's inspirations, I advice you to do so civilly and not accuse others of trying to spread propaganda. In the meantime, blanking pages and reverting staff comments just because you don't like what they're saying is also not kosher. Ultimately, take a time out and have a breather. I had left your talk page open to being edited by you, but since you seem unable to maturely handle that, I took that away for the duration of your block. I'm sorry for your inconvenience of being unable to respond. Have a good week. [[User:ArcToraphim|Kai]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 00:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:51, 4 December 2022
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Valentio! | |
Thank you for joining our community! By creating an account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. This is a brief introduction to Bulbapedia's rules and resources to help you get started:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! |
Edit warring
Please do not continuously revert edits, it falls under edit warring and is a blockable offense. I have blocked both you and KryptonLion from editing the Pokémon world in relation to the real world article for two days. If you disagree with an edit, go to the talk page of the user that reverted you or the talk page of the article in dispute. Do not just keep going back and forth with the reverts. Thank you.--ForceFire 15:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Sitewide block
Please do not create another account to circumvent a block in an attempt to sneak an edit through while the other party is still blocked from editting that page. That only makes things worse for yourself, as you are now blocked from editting the whole site (rather than just the one article) for three days. Do it again, and the block will just get longer. Thank you.--ForceFire 16:56, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to remove something by someone who is arguing in good faith, especially on a page all about speculation, then you should wait for a good consensus. To me, it feels like you're walking right up to the line of edit warring in order to have your way—and it may just be that the only reason you didn't cross it was because KrptonLion was smart enough not to do it first. (Of course, this is also ignoring all the stuff you're removing in the first place recently.)
From what I see on the talk page of that article, I don't think anyone agrees with your substantive removals. (By which I mean, at most I think some of them acknowledged that "notes" were getting large, but there are many ideas being removed.) I'm not good at digging into this origin stuff, it's hard to keep straight just by reading. But again: it's a page of speculation. It's possible to make too far a leap, but so far no one but you seems to be saying that the things you've removed are too far.
I suggest that instead of being worried about removing content on the Pokemon world in relation to the real world article, you focus on adding things that may have been missed. If other people think it fits, just leave it alone, please. Tiddlywinks (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Blocked again
You're being quite unreasonable and acting in bad faith, as well as being aggressive. For the record, no you don't know SleepySheep's IP (because I checked, they don't match) and the account is, in fact, a week old (I checked that, too), so your suspicions are unfounded and if you continue to harass them or KryptonLion about being sockpuppets when you come back, your return will likely be short lived. If you come back and return to the discussion of Paldea's inspirations, I advice you to do so civilly and not accuse others of trying to spread propaganda. In the meantime, blanking pages and reverting staff comments just because you don't like what they're saying is also not kosher. Ultimately, take a time out and have a breather. I had left your talk page open to being edited by you, but since you seem unable to maturely handle that, I took that away for the duration of your block. I'm sorry for your inconvenience of being unable to respond. Have a good week. Kai * the Arc Toraph 00:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)