Talk:Mew (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
ElectAbuzzzz (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Talk:Mew (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate": closed vote ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
OK, fanboys, stop right there. The reason an article gets featured is because it stands out from the rest. Just because it's Pokémon number XYZ to be created, doesn't mean it necessarily gets flaunted. If you cast your vote because you believe the ''Pokémon'' to be special, go back and take a look at what we are actually voting on—the ''article''. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 23:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:04, 2 July 2009
Support (14)
- Nominate its the first Pokemon ever made, it was trademark registered even before the term Pokémon, also the article contains lots of in depth information, interesting trivia which hasnt span out of control, in all, a more than worthy candidate to be a Featured Article --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Support One of the best species articles with information on all areas covered. --FabuVinny |Talk Page| 19:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome, article and it was made before Pokémon itself!--David Aipom (Speaks To Me):] Sonic Electronic 20:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support. It is detailed and has every single part, especially with the move tutors. The sprites are good as well. ht14 19:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- its an awesome pokemon plus my favorite--MyUU 20:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's a very comprehensive article, with full information on almost everything. Plus, it hasn't had any recent edit wars to screw it up. LordArceus 23:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support. The best species article behind Bulbasaur, very informative. --Kevzo8 12:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Mew is one of the coolest pokemon around and one of the best legendary Pokemon besides Suicune De Wolfy is here 23:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ja, it and Bulbasaur are on the same level, and I supported Bulbasaur, so...--Cassandra Teh Kkllnnator K 01:36, 25
December 2008 (UTC)
- Support No doubt about it, this is an excellent page. And the Trivia doesn't fill up the whole screen. 'ŚĥîΠŶPî₭₳ĉĥŭ' 00:22, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support I wasn't going to nominate anthing but when I saw mew I couldn't resist. Withought a doubt, this is one very fine article. Pikawitchu 14:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- A truly brilliant article. Grammar is precise and correct, and the trivia isn't long and bizzare, unlike some FACs. I'm surprised it's not an FA already. Alpha Totodile 22:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Very decisive article and probably one of the greatest Legendary Pokémon to date. Also has the most anime movie appearances to date of a main Legendary Pokémon. -MasterKenobi 22:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Great article. One of my favorite Pokémon too. --Galladeon 23:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support An asset to the wiki, all Pokemon Articles should be to its standard. --EmpoleonDynamite 23:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose (0)
Other comments
OK, fanboys, stop right there. The reason an article gets featured is because it stands out from the rest. Just because it's Pokémon number XYZ to be created, doesn't mean it necessarily gets flaunted. If you cast your vote because you believe the Pokémon to be special, go back and take a look at what we are actually voting on—the article. — THE TROM — 23:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
