User talk:Dark0805

Make a Post

Eh, what's this? I'm on PvX too, yet I don't get a single comment on my talk page! For shame. By the way, as of a few moments ago, I've got a wonderful little hitlist list of other GW wiki users on my Stuffbox. (there's also a nearly-finished sortable PokéDex, among other crap and things.) -- Jioruji Derako.> 02:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I see you mainly on gwiki, and remember you mainly as having funny comments on the old forums. sorry, but i didnt know you as much as readem.Dark0805 15:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

And apparently [] doesnt work here. what the f***.Dark0805 15:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

It does. [1] Agent #448 ^{☆ | ♥} 15:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't forget, you use the [[Piped|links]] for same-wiki links, and [spaced links] for external links. :P

And also, Skuld's not around anymore, so I mostly troll Grinch's page now. Oh, someone should talk Grinch into joining here. He draws pictures of Piplup, so he must me a fan... (that's perfectly good reasoning and you know it!) -- Jioruji Derako.> 15:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you aware of wifileague.net, jio? if so, then you might know a few of my friends. msimiliar to in gw, i may suck, but my friends are significant. hmm, PVX:SIG could be really useful here, if you get my drift. and skuld r gone =/. /cut.Dark0805 16:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Removed parent template. wtf kinda bullshit is that?Dark0805 16:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Wifileague? Never heard of it before, unfortunately. I generally don't play Pokémon games for too long, sadly; I buy new games when they come out, play them for a few months, then start EV-training and get bored of it. (Maybe I should stop EV-training.) Most I've done over Wi-Fi is battle Auron (using Guild Wars as a very expensive IM program). So not much PvP for me, Pokémon-wise.

Oh, and as for the template... technically, I don't believe you can get into trouble for language (there's really no policy against it), but at the same time, this is a Pokémon Wiki. Let's not forget one of Pokémon's main demographics, eh? (although at the same time, most players in that age group won't be actively avoiding tagged pages or anything, if they happen to be checking user pages and reading conversations). If any twelve-year-olds get offended by my comment here, then I apologize, and respectively ask why the hell you're reading this. :P -- Jioruji Derako.> 02:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Leave it

The main page is in there now, but whenever that page is updated, it tells us which ones aren't categorized. There are some that slip through the cracks, and they show up on that page. So I wouldn't recommend deleting it. Besides, I don't believe I have the authority to delete special pages. --PAK Man ^Talk 21:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

And I think that the Special pages are inherent to the Wiki software... TTEchidna 19:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

My fault, i worded badly. I meant simply removing it fomr the "things to do" section. Removing the page it self would be beyond retarded. And while your'e right, special pages are "inherent" as you put it, they can, i believe, be deleted.Dark0805 (talk|contribs) 19:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Zhen Lin would be the one to talk to on that matter, PAK Man suggested that to me as well. Zhen's got direct access to the software and server, from what I know, so he would be in charge of matters like that. Simply adding the Main Page to a category is another fix I suggested (something like Category:Bulbapedia or something). -- Jioruji Derako.> 21:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Sig

Success!Dark0805 (talk|contribs) 18:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:hai

Hello. I don't really contribute to this wiki. In response to your question, I am ok at HB. Not as good as some however (I blame this on labtop touchpad). Readem 02:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Whatever. Its good to talk to you a bit, and tbh, i suck so terribad at HB, its not even funny. i farm the unrated at rating <1000, but i still have more losses than wins(in rated, mind you).Dark0805 (talk|contribs) 13:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Shiny Noctowl

Apparently, this user thinks that censoring your content on Talk:Dragon trio is the right thing to do. I've tried telling Shiny Noctowl that you might not want that content censored, but he's not listening. Just thought I'd tell you. --Shiningpikablu252 15:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

At least I have some decency left. Shiny^?! 15:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Vigilantism still isn't the way to fix it if you don't like the language, Shiny. Ask Dark personally to change it, if he doesn't want to, it's really not your business to do it for him. If you really think language on the wiki is such a big deal, bring it up with an admin and suggest a policy or something, don't possibly break more policies just to fix it. Otherwise, just get used to it. People curse sometimes, it's not that big a deal. And they're just words. -- Jioruji Derako.> 18:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, jioruji, and really, its not like i am such a terrible person and profane every page i go to. I curse a bit, but, tbh, unless there's a policy, i am totally within my rights. Not to mention, i'm moderately in favor of a policy. This is a kid's game. Shining, your concern is welcome, but i'm worried you may be thinking i am really mad about this. I couldn't care less about the cursing. But, seriously, both Tina's and Noctowl's arrogance is borderline shocking. Noctowl (and Tina), when you edit someone else's post and don't make any apology for it you lack all decency.Dark0805 (talk|contribs) 14:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Grawp is happy

lulDark0805 (talk|contribs) 15:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

...wow, that's almost, almost as bad as that Gwen porno fanfiction people were using to vandalize GuildWiki back when Eye of the North was being released. -- Jioruji Derako.> 06:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

*asks for page so he may "investigate" the history of the article*. oh, and, many lulz:[2]. lol top rated articles.Dark0805 (talk|contribs) 13:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh wonderful, I always wanted a wiki article to explain the act of teabagging to me.

As for the article history, they've unfortunately been purged from the history. Let me just say, they were quite nasty and incredibly well-written. -- Jioruji Derako.> 04:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)