Talk:April Fools' Day 2023: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(List of questions to answer regarding the Cave of Dragonflies contribution to this page)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
*The current writeup truncates the theory down to just the intro + the designs, to avoid essentially putting fanfiction next to official information. (Since it is April Fools, it gets outlandish. It also involves the origins of said Fakemon). Should we print a proper summary anyway?
*The current writeup truncates the theory down to just the intro + the designs, to avoid essentially putting fanfiction next to official information. (Since it is April Fools, it gets outlandish. It also involves the origins of said Fakemon). Should we print a proper summary anyway?
*Considering the points of these pages is fandom history, should we explain the context for the theory? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 04:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
*Considering the points of these pages is fandom history, should we explain the context for the theory? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 04:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:I read through the new section and everything looks alright, it's descriptive enough while still being succinct. If you feel like there's other things you can add to it, go for it, but i think the section is alright just as is. [[User:Anzasquiddles|'''<span style="color:#CF7A87;">an</span><span style="color:#2F2C2E;"><span lang="ja" style="margin: 0px;">Z</span></span><span style="color:#297E55;"><span lang="ja" style="margin: 0px;">A</span></span><span style="color:#CF7A87;">squiddles</span>''']] <small>2222(:D)SSSS</small> ([[User talk:Anzasquiddles|talk]]) 03:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:29, 3 June 2024

Cave of Dragonflies

So, that edit summary huh? I felt my hand was forced before I could come to a decision. (Reminder to self to chill out) But, now we have to figure some things out.

  • Do we have to name the Fakemon?
    • Should we specify the Fakemon was created when the webmaster was younger? (It's silly, they admit it) This also better contextualizes the event.
  • The current writeup truncates the theory down to just the intro + the designs, to avoid essentially putting fanfiction next to official information. (Since it is April Fools, it gets outlandish. It also involves the origins of said Fakemon). Should we print a proper summary anyway?
  • Considering the points of these pages is fandom history, should we explain the context for the theory? Salmancer (talk) 04:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I read through the new section and everything looks alright, it's descriptive enough while still being succinct. If you feel like there's other things you can add to it, go for it, but i think the section is alright just as is. anZAsquiddles 2222(:D)SSSS (talk) 03:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)