Talk:DP069: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


I believe it is a sign that croagunk will evolve, maybe some time in the future. Why else have a shiny toxicroak?
I believe it is a sign that croagunk will evolve, maybe some time in the future. Why else have a shiny toxicroak?
==Toxicroak's Shinyness/True or not?==
I have a pretty strong belief that Toxicroak isn't shiny and I'd like to see the alternate coloration info removed. Anyone agree? --[[User:Jonouchi|Ricco]] 03:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:45, 9 March 2008

Is it really confirmed?I cannot see it in the BulbaNews!-Billy4b2004 04:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Bulbanews just reports the news; it isn't a primary source. Plus, the article is already there now anyway. --FabuVinny T-C-S 05:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Toxicroak???

  • Is Saturn stealing the spotlight of Team Galactic again??? (assuming that they use the very same Pokémon they used in the games, much like the Gym Leaders) Ej92 12:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Yup, just as I thought, Saturn is stealing the spotlight for Team Galactic AGAIN. Ej92 03:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
It makes perfect sense to use the character that has been building up the organisation's presence for the first confrontation with Team Twerps. The other two admins will have their time in the spotlight - the Team Galactic plotline starts here. --FabuVinny T-C-S 12:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Croagunk

I think croagunk will evolve because it fights its evolved form and it gets all mad at it having some sort of staring contest with its evolution.

no evo-glow, no jumpin to conclusions. 45px 45pxKPF30px 30px 06:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe it is a sign that croagunk will evolve, maybe some time in the future. Why else have a shiny toxicroak?


Toxicroak's Shinyness/True or not?

I have a pretty strong belief that Toxicroak isn't shiny and I'd like to see the alternate coloration info removed. Anyone agree? --Ricco 03:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)