Talk:Reshiram (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
(→Dragon) |
Megamaxxor (talk | contribs) (→Intro) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{forums notice|March 31, 2011}} | {{forums notice|March 31, 2011}} | ||
I do belive that in the obtain section It shouldent say Black olny because we all know after we encounter the mascot we always encounter the mascot of the twin game later on | |||
== Possible coincidental origin? == | == Possible coincidental origin? == |
Revision as of 12:32, 28 June 2010
This talkpage is only for discussion of the article itself!
As the subject of this article is recently released, information on the page may change rapidly. Please make absolutely sure that the information that you wish to add to the article is able to be confirmed independently by yourself or another Bulbapedia user or administrator. Please take any other discussion or questions regarding the subject of the article to the Bulbagarden Forums, where you can discuss it freely with other members of the Bulbagarden community. An admin can remove this template at his or her discretion. |
I do belive that in the obtain section It shouldent say Black olny because we all know after we encounter the mascot we always encounter the mascot of the twin game later on
Possible coincidental origin?
(No idea what to title this section) I know that we know almost absolutely nothing on the actual origins of Reshiram and Zekrom, but ever since noticing that Zekrom is in White and Reshiram is in Black, it sorta brought me to mind of the concept of Yin and yang. This is probably just coincidence and means absolutely nothing, but something I decided to bring up nonetheless. Mudkipchan 00:39, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- That's been on a lot of people's minds since the game names were out. But with the switched legendaries, maybe we can look more into it.--Pokélova! 00:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Dragon
I know that the Daisuke club called them the legendary dragon pokemon, but since we don't have officially published types listed as such, isn't kind of jumping the gun a bit to already list them as dragon types when they quite possibly could have secondary types as well? --Ryuutakeshi 06:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- We're a Wiki Ryuu, we list what information we have as of now. At the moment, we know they're Template:Type2s, so we'll keep it at that until more info becomes available.--Pokélova! 06:37, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Was it ever actually said they're Dragon-type? Or just dragons? They could be like Gyarados or Charizard...Reign 07:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Prematurely publishing information weakens the credibility of Bulbapedia as a resource. Disinfect 07:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, someones got to edit that bit out because WE DO NOT KNOW THERE OFFICIAL TYPING. Why does everyone just assume that they will be Dragon-type because they were described as "Legendary Dragon Pokemon" like a Pokedex entry would state. Where the --- is a mod. --Yusuke SS 20:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)