Talk:Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Unused Pokémon: new section)
Line 33: Line 33:
::I almost completely agree with your suggestion, but I think the unlockable characters should still be distinguished. It doesn't need to be a separate list, but we could highlight them, add notes or put all characters into a table. Any ideas? [[User:Perlgia|Perlgia]] 15:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
::I almost completely agree with your suggestion, but I think the unlockable characters should still be distinguished. It doesn't need to be a separate list, but we could highlight them, add notes or put all characters into a table. Any ideas? [[User:Perlgia|Perlgia]] 15:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
:::Put asterisks next to them, and note what the asterisk means at the bottom (or top if you'd prefer, but I think bottom would be better). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
:::Put asterisks next to them, and note what the asterisk means at the bottom (or top if you'd prefer, but I think bottom would be better). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
== Unused Pokémon ==
Although Mewtwo has been one of the most requested characters, there's no source given for the claim that it was "planned to be a playable character, but had to be cut". I couldn't find any evidence for this claim expect quotes on other Wikis and fansites. That's why I think it should be removed if nobody can give us a source. [[User:Perlgia|Perlgia]] 15:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:38, 4 February 2012

You can play as Mew in this game? --FabuVinny T-C-S 17:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

No, Mew is not a playable character, it only appears from a Poké Ball Wojjan 12:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


On a side note, I think Porygon's attack could be best described as Quick Attack Wojjan 12:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Possible Wii Virtual Console release

Check out Filb.de's page: [1]

If what it says is true, it will be released exactly 10 years from the N64 version in Japan. I know we don't consider Filb.de a viable source for anime titles, so I'm putting it here until it's considered fine to add to the article. --ケンジガール 00:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

It's possilby true because I haven't seen any false info from them.--Coolピカチュウ! 00:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Series

I saw this, and I think an article should do for this series and the Pokémon Mystery Dungeon series. ht14 02:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Not to be rude or anything

But why is there no link to SmashWiki on these pages about the main games? As a SmashWiki editor, I must say that our page has many more links that go into much further detail about the characters, stages, etc., and it would help us get on top of Google when people search the game, and not go to Wikia. Just looking for publicity, if it's okay with you. -Ivy73002MS.png 00:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

See external links down the bottom of the page. --SnorlaxMonster 09:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Poké Ball Pokémon

I overhauled the "Poké Ball Pokémon" section and it's now a convenient sortable table. Move names and the general order of the Pokémon are based on the official Japanese website. I also added a column for later appearances as Poké Ball Pokémon. Any suggestions for improvements? Perlgia 13:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Pikachu's and Jigglypuff's position in the character list

The list of characters should reflect the order of the selection screen and on the official website: Oldest characters first, newest characters last. It might seem reasonable to put the Pokémon characters first, but that makes the special category "Pokémon characters" redundant because they have already been emphasized in the character list. That's why I'd like to move Pikachu and Jigglypuff to the end of their respective lists. Any objections? Perlgia 15:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I would support putting them in the official order and removing the main article links to the Pokémon and instead making their normal links bold. Also, this would merge the default characters and unlockable ones. --SnorlaxMonster 15:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I almost completely agree with your suggestion, but I think the unlockable characters should still be distinguished. It doesn't need to be a separate list, but we could highlight them, add notes or put all characters into a table. Any ideas? Perlgia 15:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Put asterisks next to them, and note what the asterisk means at the bottom (or top if you'd prefer, but I think bottom would be better). --SnorlaxMonster 15:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused Pokémon

Although Mewtwo has been one of the most requested characters, there's no source given for the claim that it was "planned to be a playable character, but had to be cut". I couldn't find any evidence for this claim expect quotes on other Wikis and fansites. That's why I think it should be removed if nobody can give us a source. Perlgia 15:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)