User talk:0danmaster0: Difference between revisions
Metalizard (talk | contribs) (→About the Megas...: new section) |
(→Sorry about that.: new section) |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
[[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] ([[User talk:Metalizard|talk]]) 23:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] ([[User talk:Metalizard|talk]]) 23:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Sorry about that. == | |||
Is the information complete yet for moves? [[User:Wrrasba|Wrrasba]] ([[User talk:Wrrasba|talk]]) 18:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:39, 26 October 2013
Welcome to Bulbapedia, 0danmaster0! | |
By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! |
The Preview Button
Instead of editing a page several times in a row, try using the preview button to make sure your edit looks the way you want it to. It's right next to the Save Changes button. Please try it out, so as not to clog up the Recent Changes. Thanks! --★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 19:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Üserspace warning
I just wanted to let you know that over the past two days, you've edited the userspace seven times, but the mainspace only twice. The Userspace policy says that you must have at least one more mainspace edit than you do userspace edits, so in this case, you should have eight, since four edits a day at all is against the rules. Make sure to keep this in mind on further edits to the userspace. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 15:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Just a heads up
Your userpage (more properly,the list) lists Yanma as a bug/poison type. You might wanna change that.Auraguardian197 12:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- thanks for pointing that out I thought I already removed that lol. 0danmaster0 (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
You asked "since when was there some kind of arbitrary limit as to what is considered notable?"
The limit is that if something isn't unique, it's not notable enough to be included. See the concern Relicant brought up on my talk page for a longer explanation. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
About the Megas...
I'm just going to tell you what I told Blazios:
"It's redundant to have type lists for Mawile and Mega Mawile when they're the same type."
Well, that's true but I've been doing that for all Megas, because I saw that Mewtwo and Charizard's pages had a type effectiveness table even for Mega Mewtwo Y and Mega Charizard Y, even though they have the same type too. Plus, I'm adding another table just for the Megas because even though they have the same type, the notes are different. For example, Mega Mawile can't be given a Ring Target unlike regular Mawile, so it will never lose its immunity to Poison or Dragon. I think that if the staff don't want repeated tables, they should change the code of the Ring Target note and add a clause for pokémon with Mega Evos instead of undoing what I did otherwise I'm wasting my time here.
Metalizard (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that.
Is the information complete yet for moves? Wrrasba (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)