Talk:Trick-or-Treat (move): Difference between revisions
(→Trivia) |
RiverShock (talk | contribs) (→Trivia) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
"Using Trick-or-Treat on a Psychic-type Pokémon is currently the only way to deal 4x supereffective damage with Ghost or Dark attacks." Thats isn't true if Hoopa (Psychic/Ghost type) is real Pokemon.--[[User:Dominikololo|Dominikololo]] ([[User talk:Dominikololo|talk]]) 22:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | "Using Trick-or-Treat on a Psychic-type Pokémon is currently the only way to deal 4x supereffective damage with Ghost or Dark attacks." Thats isn't true if Hoopa (Psychic/Ghost type) is real Pokemon.--[[User:Dominikololo|Dominikololo]] ([[User talk:Dominikololo|talk]]) 22:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Hoopa has not been officially revealed to be a real Pokémon to begin with so the trivia still stands as valid. - [[User:050294|050294]] ([[User talk:050294|talk]]) 22:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | :Hoopa has not been officially revealed to be a real Pokémon to begin with so the trivia still stands as valid. - [[User:050294|050294]] ([[User talk:050294|talk]]) 22:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Also on this particular trivia entry... Should Inverse Battles be ignored for this? I ask because Pangoro is 4x weak to Dark under those conditions. [[User:RiverShock|RiverShock]] ([[User talk:RiverShock|talk]]) 16:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:20, 18 December 2013
What, exactly, does Trick-or-Treat do?
Turns out that, unlike Soak in Generation V, Trick-or-Treat does not change or negate the Pokemon's original typing -- use it against a dual-typed Pokémon and that Pokémon is now effectively triple-typed.
I conducted the following experiment to evaluate this:
- Find a wild Normal-type Pokemon (because Normal is immune to Ghost) and use Trick-or-Treat.
- Test Ghost, Dark, and other types against the affected Pokemon.
My results:
- vs. pure Normal (Bidoof, Dunsparce):
- Shadow Sneak had no effect (Normal influence).
- Night Slash was supereffective (Ghost influence). Signal Beam was not very effective.
- vs. Normal+Flying (Fletchling and Pidgey):
- Shadow Sneak had no effect (Normal influence).
- Discharge proved supereffective (Flying influence).
- Night Slash proved supereffective (Ghost influence).
- vs. Azurill (Normal+Fairy):
- Shadow Sneak had no effect (Normal influence).
- Night Slash inflicted neutral damage and was NOT supereffective (Fairy resists Dark).
- vs. Litleo (Fire+Normal):
- Surf proved supereffective (Fire influence).
- Shadow Sneak failed to affect Litleo (Normal influence).
- Night Slash proved supereffective (Ghost influence).
- vs. Pumpkaboo (Ghost+Grass):
- Trick-or-Treat failed outright.
(PS - And while running around locating all these Pokemon I caught a shiny Azurill. :) ) --Stratelier 18:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Pokémon with four types?
Has anyone tested if Trick-or-Treat's effect stacks with that of Forest's Curse, or do these attacks fail if the target already has three types? (Divdax (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC))
Trivia
"Using Trick-or-Treat on a Psychic-type Pokémon is currently the only way to deal 4x supereffective damage with Ghost or Dark attacks." Thats isn't true if Hoopa (Psychic/Ghost type) is real Pokemon.--Dominikololo (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hoopa has not been officially revealed to be a real Pokémon to begin with so the trivia still stands as valid. - 050294 (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also on this particular trivia entry... Should Inverse Battles be ignored for this? I ask because Pangoro is 4x weak to Dark under those conditions. RiverShock (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)