Talk:Poké: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Move) |
(→Move) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:AFAIK that's totally informal. If there's an official term (the currency) that's actually called "Poké", it every bit deserves to be here. IMO there's no real merit for any disambig or redirect. A disclaimer of some sort, such as has been added, is entirely sufficient. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 23:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC) | :AFAIK that's totally informal. If there's an official term (the currency) that's actually called "Poké", it every bit deserves to be here. IMO there's no real merit for any disambig or redirect. A disclaimer of some sort, such as has been added, is entirely sufficient. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 23:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
::I do must agree with Tiddlywinks in this that Poké for Pokémon is entirely fan used and that Poké is the official name for the currency, the disclaimer currently used on the page is sufficient. On the matter if the page should be moved or not I do not currently have an opinnion, but if the page is going to be moved to Poké (currency) then Poké should redirect there and not a disambiguation page. --[[User:Raltseye|Raltseye]] ([[User talk:Raltseye|talk]]) 10:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | ::I do must agree with Tiddlywinks in this that Poké for Pokémon is entirely fan used and that Poké is the official name for the currency, the disclaimer currently used on the page is sufficient. On the matter if the page should be moved or not I do not currently have an opinnion, but if the page is going to be moved to Poké (currency) then Poké should redirect there and not a disambiguation page. --[[User:Raltseye|Raltseye]] ([[User talk:Raltseye|talk]]) 10:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::The likelihood of people looking up "Poké" becauze they're after the currency is far less than that of people looking up "Pokémon" in its multiple meanings. Sure, canonical information has priority over relevant "fanonical" information but core games are also more important than spin-offs so the reasoning against the move is flawed. [[User talk:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:#4fd9ff"><span lang="ja">サトミュウ</span> (SatoMew)</span></b>]] 11:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:14, 29 September 2015
Move
"Poké" is commonly used to refer to Pokémon so it should redirect to the article about the species. サトミュウ (SatoMew) 22:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- AFAIK that's totally informal. If there's an official term (the currency) that's actually called "Poké", it every bit deserves to be here. IMO there's no real merit for any disambig or redirect. A disclaimer of some sort, such as has been added, is entirely sufficient. Tiddlywinks (talk) 23:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- I do must agree with Tiddlywinks in this that Poké for Pokémon is entirely fan used and that Poké is the official name for the currency, the disclaimer currently used on the page is sufficient. On the matter if the page should be moved or not I do not currently have an opinnion, but if the page is going to be moved to Poké (currency) then Poké should redirect there and not a disambiguation page. --Raltseye (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- The likelihood of people looking up "Poké" becauze they're after the currency is far less than that of people looking up "Pokémon" in its multiple meanings. Sure, canonical information has priority over relevant "fanonical" information but core games are also more important than spin-offs so the reasoning against the move is flawed. サトミュウ (SatoMew) 11:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- I do must agree with Tiddlywinks in this that Poké for Pokémon is entirely fan used and that Poké is the official name for the currency, the disclaimer currently used on the page is sufficient. On the matter if the page should be moved or not I do not currently have an opinnion, but if the page is going to be moved to Poké (currency) then Poké should redirect there and not a disambiguation page. --Raltseye (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
