Talk:Marriland: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Politoed666 (talk | contribs) |
m (→NO to deletion) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::::No. We should delete it and be done with it. I've met Devin, and he doesn't really meet the notability criteria. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 23:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC) | :::::No. We should delete it and be done with it. I've met Devin, and he doesn't really meet the notability criteria. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 23:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::::Someone curious about Marriland or Marriland Forums might easily search for this; my vote is to simply redirect this page to the Marriland Forums page. If there's notable info on Marriland himself worth mentioning, it can be done there. Anyone against that idea? --[[user:Jioruji_Derako|<font color="#237d00"> '''J'''ïörüjï '''Ð'''ērākō.'''>'''</font>]]<small>[[user talk:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">''.cнаt'''''^'''</font>]]</small> 20:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:07, 11 April 2008
ADVERTISEMENTS ARE BAD! NO TO THIS PAGEC Isfor Cookie 01:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really think it's an advertisement. It's just a crappily-made article with no redeeming qualities. --ニョロトノ666 01:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Don't forget, as well as deleting the main article, we need to delete the talk page also! MoldyOrange 02:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- dont we have Serebii.com as an artcle? MAGNEDETH 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I like this article. Not the quality of course (what's with having a Pokemon infobox), but Marriland is a well established site, and this is not advertising. There's other articles on useful sites, such as Serebii. I just cleaned it up. I vote it stays. Porygon-Z 02:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- dont we have Serebii.com as an artcle? MAGNEDETH 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
NO to deletion
I think we need to raise "awareness" of some pretty good websites like this. Plus, who cares if it's crappy, somebody will eventually clean it up and make it look better.
- We already have an article on Marriland Forums. We don't necessarily need a page on its webmaster. --PAK Man Talk 20:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Someone curious about Marriland or Marriland Forums might easily search for this; my vote is to simply redirect this page to the Marriland Forums page. If there's notable info on Marriland himself worth mentioning, it can be done there. Anyone against that idea? -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 20:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)