Talk:Wigglytuff (Pokémon)

Due to special coding in place in the article, the artwork featured on this article will change every year on February 27 — the release of Red and Green in Japan September 28 — the release of Red and Blue in the United States. This will only affect the artwork shown in the infobox. This changes every year, so when the time comes, click here to return to the page and change the display.

Enough with all of the Arceus comparisons!!!!!

Didn't anyone learn from the mistake on Crobat's page!? NO ARCEUS COMPARISONS!!! SharKing 21:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)SharKing

Let's review just whom has what over Arceus, so we can stop this trivia add-ins once and for all:

• HP: Blissey, Chansey, Wobbuffet, Wailord, Snorlax, Giratina (both the Another form and the Origin form), Slaking, Drifblim, Hariyama, Wigglytuff, Munchlax, Lapras, Vaporeon, Wailmer, Lanturn.
  • Cresselia ties with Arceus.
• Attack: Deoxys Normal and Attack forms, Rampardos, Slaking, Regigigas, Groudon, Rayquaza, Rhyperior, Salamence, Metagross, Dragonite, Tyranitar, Machamp, Kingler, Rhydon, Flareon, Scizor, Ursaring, Ho-Oh, Breloom, Absol, Garchomp, Mamoswine, Pinsir, Gyarados, Heracross, Armaldo, Cranidos, Honchkrow, Gallade, Azelf, Electivire.
  • Origin form Giratina, Hitmonlee, Granbull, Donphan, Blaziken, Hariyama, Sharpedo, Crawdaunt, Staraptor, Luxray, Weavile, Dialga, and Palkia tie with Arceus.
• Defense: Shuckle, Steelix, Regirock, Cloyster, Aggron, Bastiodon, Onix, Defense form Deoxys, Registeel, Probopass, Forretress, Skarmory, Lairon, Torkoal, Groudon, Nosepass, Dusknoir, Golem, Lugia, Dusclops, Relicanth, Metagross, Rhyperior, Leafeon, Uxie, Omastar, Tangrowth, Gliscor.
  • Weezing, Rhydon, Magcargo, Donphan, Dialga, Another form Giratina, and Cresselia tie with Arceus.
• Speed: Any form of Deoxys except Defense form, Ninjask, Electrode, Jolteon, Aerodactyl, Mewtwo, Crobat, Sky form Shaymin, Swellow, Weavile, Darkrai.
  • Dugtrio, Alakazam, and Sceptile tie with Arceus.
• Sp.Atk: Deoxys Normal and Attack forms, Mewtwo, Kyogre, Rayquaza, Dialga, Palkia, Alakazam, Porygon-Z, Darkrai, Gengar, Espeon, Latios, Magnezone, Glaceon, Heatran, Exeggutor, Zapdos, Moltres, Gardevoir, Roserade, Magmortar, Azelf.
  • Origin form Giratina, Sky form Shaymin, Kadabra, Magneton, and Togekiss tie with Arceus.
• Sp.Def: Shuckle, Regice, Defense form Deoxys, Lugia, Ho-Oh, Registeel, Probopass, Mantine, Kyogre, Bastiodon, Blissey, Dusknoir, Umbreon, Dusclops, Latias, Uxie, Cresselia, Articuno, Milotic.
  • Tentacruel, Mr. Mime, Claydol, Kecleon, Mantyke, Palkia, and Another form Giratina tie with Arceus.

In closing: Comparisons with Arceus are not notable trivia, lest we add such pieces to a huge chunk of species. --Shiningpikablu252 22:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad to see somebody other than me make an effort to stop these annoying comparisons. Just because Arceus is called the "God of Pokémon" doesn't mean it's worth comparing stats. SharKing 16:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)SharKing

BrightPowder!

Just traded a Wigglytuff from Pokémon Red version to Crystal version and it was holding a BrightPowder. This item is only supposed to be held by Pokémon with a catch rate of 3 (i.e. Legendary Birds and Mewtwo). I don't remember where I caught this Wigglytuff but it is Level 19, so it's most likely a Jigglypuff which was evolved into Wigglytuff immediately. hfc2X 02:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Locked

Since Jigglypuff was added to the fairy type it is likely Wigglytuff will be one as well but we're best locking the page till it is confirmed.--Ovidkid (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Can we assume that Wigglytuff is a Moon Rabbit in origin now?

-Evolves after using a Moon Stone

-Has rabbit ears

-Is a Fairy type and Moonlight and MoonBlast are Fairy moves

This may seem debatable for people that are critical on evidence, but I feel that they gave out allot of hints on this pokemon's inspiration that doesn't make the "Moon rabbit" base less obvious.

Wigglytough

Is the part explaining the naming of this Pokémon "Wigglytuff" rather than "Wigglytough" due to name limit really necessary? Mangaman13 (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

No it isn't, so now it's gone. Glik (talk) 00:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Japanese Name Origin

The part about fuusen and fukureru seems really flimsy. More so for the other two evolutions but here, too. My problem is that the names are Purin, Pukurin, and Pupurin. Purin is clearly the very commonly used transliteration of Pudding used commonly. There is no good reason to assume it has anything to do with the word for balloon. An argument could be made for fukureru indirectly by way of puku-puku which can be used to mean cute and chubby, pudgy, or (most relevantly) puffed up. --Vanya (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

There is no good reason to assume it has anything to do with the word for balloon.

You do know what Pokémon you're talking about right? The one that puffs up like a balloon? So it's just as valid.--ForceFire 14:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't see how that is relevant to figuring out where the name came from since there is factually nothing in it to indicate balloons or inflating. There are simpler valid alternatives that make sense and help bring in the Balloon category name contextually.

fuusen + purin = pukurin? Makes no sense. There is no ku in fuusen in any pronunciation of the kanji. And it has no connection to purin which uses a short pu sound and not a long one. If they meant this then it would be Fuukurin and then you still have to explain where the ku comes from and fuku doesn't cut it because it's a completely different word.

fukureru + purin = pukurin? Closer, but doesn't pan out. If it was so then it would have been Fukurin. No reason to change it to pu from fu when pukupuku does the job more neatly.

pukupuku + purin = pukurin? There's your most likely origin. pukupuku means cute and chubby or puffed up. It combines well with the name and satisfies the idea of this being a more advanced form and even incorporates the balloon aspect and invokes the thought of it's cuteness and plump shape.

Fuusen and Fukureru simply do not have a concrete connection to the Japanese name and cause more issues than they solve.

And as for Igglybuff and Jigglypuff, there is literally nothing in either pupurin or purin to andicate anything even remotely like fuusen or fukureru.

Purin is a commonly used abbreviation for pudding. There is no need to conjecture further much like lizaado is simply lizard and sando is simply sand. Purin is simply Pudd'n.

There is also no merit in injecting fuusen and fukureru into pupurin when you have pupu as a much more likely candidate. And again it even has a connection to the balloon family name by way of meaning the sound of something inflating or poof.--Vanya (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

'Purin'=pudding may be the obvious connection, but it's not one that actually makes a lot of sense. (FWIW, it's also not an abbreviation or anything, like "pudd'n"; it's just straight up "pudding".)

Fukureru is easily justified just by letting the first character acquire a handakuten. Japanese does that kind of sound change plenty often when joining kanji; the sounds 'hu', 'bu', and 'pu' are very plainly related in Japanese, so fukureru really isn't a big stretch. (FWIW, our JP partners (i.e., native speakers) also like fukureru for the name origin.) Tiddlywinks (talk) 17:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

According to this purin is an abbreviation... プリン (n) (1) (abbr) (See プディング) (custard) pudding; source: http://nihongo.monash.edu/cgi-bin/wwwjdic?1C

Further, pudding is not an "obvious connection" it is the actual word used. There is no mystery there.

Also, I can't help but notice that fuusen isn't mentioned as a possible name origin in that link to the Japanese Wiki, nor is puripuri or kurikuri mentioned.

Fukureru is possible, like I mentioned above, I just think that pukupuku is far more likely as it is a simpler word that has a similar enough meaning and is easier for children to interpret. Plus it already has the handakuten. No matter how you look at it Fukureru is more of a stretch, not much more, but still more nonetheless.--Vanya (talk) 04:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)