User talk:SandmanDP

Welcome to Bulbapedia, SandmanDP!

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:

Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct.
Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around.
Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page.
Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style.
You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy.
Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page.
If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite.
Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
For more handy links, see the welcome portal.

Thank you, and have a good time editing here!

Truth seeker 4449 21:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Recent edits on Emily Jenness

Hi, what you did there was an edit war, and those are not really welcome here. I feel this issue could have been resolved quickly if you used the talk page for the article, that's a great place to discuss some stuff that you believe are wrong, and you can propose to change it, this way we can avoid edit wars, and possibly harassment as well. Thank you. Masatoshi_talk 22:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Moving Pages

Hi, for future reference, the next time you move a page check to see if there is a talk page. If there is you have to mark te property in the move information page that says "Move Associated talk page" to move the talk page as well. This prevents unneeded talk page redirects from occuring. Thanks. Also if your going to reply to this message please do it here so the conversation can stay on one page and be easier for people to follow. Thank you! --Pokemaster 97 18:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

If you're talking about Jimmy Zoppi. I tried to but there was something with the destination talkpage that prevented it... I did everything for it to be successful though--SandmanDP 18:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh I see. I think that no one ever deleted the old talk page redirect which prevented you from moving it. Nevermind then :p. --Pokemaster 97 18:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

The Preview Button

Instead of editing a page several times in a row, try using the preview button to make sure your edit looks the way you want it to. It's right next to the Save Changes button... Please try it out, so as not to clog up the Recent Changes. Thanks! -- ✔Poké.geek™✔ 20:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

So sorry about that. I didn't see the mistake until afterwards--SandmanDP 20:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Vote tampering

Removing any polls, or votes for any matter, is considered vote tampering. That is not allowed here, it's a form of vandalisim. Please stop. サトシ 22:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

The same goes for removing talk page comments, FYI. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 22:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Missigno Master, the vote was ordered NOT to be made. Satoshi removed MY talkpage comment first. Reread the discussion from the beginning. the vote is illegal--SandmanDP 22:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

See the section "Talk Page Comments." (Your comment was bossy and unreasonable, and you were being hypocritical when you claimed I was being bossy, which I wasn't!) サトシ 22:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Even if it was an illegal vote, you should have left it up to the staff. And that still doesn't explain why you were casting a vote in the Sabrina's Haunter talk page, the poll for which had already ended. Or why you removed this talk page comment to begin with. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 22:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk Page Comments

Removing talk page comments, including the initial welcome template, is prohibited per Bulbapedia's talk page policy. Please do not remove any comments in the future. If you wish to clean old comments away, you should archive your talk page instead. Thank you! -- ✔Poké.geek™✔ 22:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Pokegeek, you removed my talkpage comment. TWICE. Stop being a hypocrite. This is also blatant harassment. --SandmanDP 22:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

He did it because you were being very unreasonable, not to mention bossy and rude. This is going way too far! サトシ 22:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

How was I being rude and unreasonable? Stop making claims you can't back up!--SandmanDP 22:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You tried to vote on an already closed poll, and tried to prematurely close an open one. Both of those constitute vandalism and are thus an exception to the "no removing talkpage comments" rule. Poke.geek was in the right. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 22:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You removed my talkpage comments. If letting my voice be heard is vandalism, then all registered voters would be in jail. You are not above the rules--SandmanDP 22:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, you do not make all of those desisions. The admins do. Starting a consensus is perfectly fine, in fact it's a solution. サトシ 22:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Satoshi101, stop being a hypocrite. What part of "SnorlaxMonster protected the page this morning" don't you understand?--SandmanDP 22:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You really should stop calling people hypocrites. It's perfectly reasonable to start a vote, and you have no right to continually revert it (which, by the way, is known as edit warring, also against the rules!). Leave. It. To. The. Staff. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 22:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

To SandmanDP, This is the last straw. I am calling for you to be blocked. You're violating so many things, and now you're edit warring. サトシ 22:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not a hypocrite if I'm following admin decisions. I never removed any talkpage comments until I was being HARASSED for something I didn't do! What rules did I actually violate before you actually accused me?--SandmanDP 22:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, from what I can see, you tried to submit a vote on Talk:Sabrina's Haunter when it was already closed. As explained above, that constitutes vote tampering, a violation of the rules. You then proceeded to remove valid talkpage content, and continue to remove it when it was added back. Removing talk page comments and edit tampering are also rule violations. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs) 22:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

That's not tampering. Why can't my voice be heard? The talkpage comment I removed was harassment against me. That's invalid. You say I violate rules when no rules have been cited. You haven't even condemned Satoshi101 for he did, when he vandalized several pages--SandmanDP 23:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

See this Toon Ganondorf is an admin. Am I wrong now? -- ✔Poké.geek™✔ 23:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, because that was done AFTER you reverted ine. Something you had no right to do.--SandmanDP 23:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I NEVER vandalized ANY pages. You are so gonna be blocked. サトシ 23:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You did vandalize and I showed you where. Now please, leave me alone--SandmanDP 23:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

What I did was NOT vandalisim! You need to leave us alone. サトシ 23:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Why do I have to leave? You're the one who is violating the rules repeatedly--SandmanDP 23:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Both of you are getting too worked up over this. You've both been blocked to give you time to calm down. Please read the Code of conduct, and come back with a calmer attitude. ^★Jo the Marten^★ ಠ_ಠ ♥ 23:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Jimmy Zoppi#Consensus Time

Please confirm your opinion. I've put your vote as Zoppi, but just in case, you can change it if you change your mind. Thx! サトシ 17:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

A piece of friendly advice...

Don't argue incessantly. If you want to edit this site, make minor spelling and grammar corrections until you have a good rep. if you want to debate(not argue or troll), go to the forums. you're headed down a dark path, and I will be sad to see another person permablocked on the grounds of constant insubordination, flaming and baiting, and over-use of talk pages. Lay low for a while, make small, neutral edits without saying anything in them(again, like spelling and grammar). just being a friendly adviser, without saying anything about the content of the conflicts you are involved in. Good luck, --Muk-a-matic-Maketh the Muk go round... 05:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

But what would be the use of talkpages? They are using whacky double standards to justify their incorrect metaphors, treat me like I don't deserve direct explanations, and I have THREE pages protected against me when they didnt even need tthe defense. I'm being victimized here TWICE and I've only been here a week--SandmanDP 05:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't focus on talk pages, They are for discussion and debate, not arguing(debate and argue have different connotations, look it up) Focus on the mainspace. i used to make the same mistakes you are, and i got chewed out in the same way, so I just decided to keep it simple, and not argue about stuff like that. Speaking of debating, this is my final statement to you, as a friendly, non-argumentative editor:Don't start, don't enter, don't finish arguments or edit/reversion wars.--Muk-a-matic-Maketh the Muk go round... 05:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Chill

Let me give you a piece of advice. Ok, two. The first is you have to relax. Not everyone is out to get you. The second, well, let me put it this way: If one person tells you that you are wrong, then you might be. But if a lot of people tell you that you are wrong, then there is a pretty dern good chance that you are wrong. No one is out to get you, and no one is singling you out. You just can't seem to start any discussion without the intent to start a fight. We're civilized people, and we talk our problems out, but you start wars everywhere you go. You are antagonistic. Even when shown a mountain of facts, you just see it as an attack, and you hit back, and then you keep hitting. Then, you go and make a complete hypicrite out of yourself (seriously, you say she owned the Shellder, and straightaway write "while she never owned it..."). If we are as stubborn and contestant as you say we are, then how did this wiki get anywhere? By your opinion, we are too busy attacking our users and arguing over incorrect details.

The fact of the matter is this: You need to stop antagonizing everyone who opposes you. You bring an aura of unproductivity everywhere you go that I am not going to allow to exist on my wiki. This is not a threat, but a warning. Don't argue about the topic, discuss the topic. I've seen you make good edits, and I want to keep seeing them, but right now they are hidden in a cloud of egotism. Get rid of the cloud, we're all friends here. Now before you go thinking I'm making this up, I'll tell you this. If I wanted you gone, I would have blocked you indefinitely, but I didn't, and I don't want to. -- MAG NE DETH 05:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

AG133

Max did tell May about Ash when he was in the Jhoto Silver Conference which was after Primeape was sent to training.- unsigned comment from Yoster10 (talk • contribs)

You're not making much sense. You don't know what happens inbetween episodes. Besides Ash was profiled during the Silver Conference. The knowledge was there--SandmanDP 16:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

Alright, this message is long overdue, and I apologize for that. If you've been in a wiki for long enough (any wiki), you'll know that there's a policy regarding mutual reversion between two or more parties, which is called an edit war, and it's a bannable offense, and the amount of times that both parties revert each other, is the number of days both are blocked to take some time to cool off and come back (here's the policy regarding that in case you want to check it). Why did you get two weeks? Because of the second edit war you have participated in, you can count seven revertions between each other, but since this is your second time edit warring, you get double the time, it being two weeks. It's not that I'm being unfair to you, he was punished as well, and we're not taking into account who's right or wrong, we're taking into account why you two didn't wait to resolve the dispute in the talk page. Jo already told you, but I'll repeat it again just in case: Kogs had to leave briefly and asked if someone could handle the block, thus why I did it. I hope this reason is good enough, and take these two weeks to think about it (and since you're at it, read the policies). Thank you and have a good day. Masatoshi_talk 05:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Dare da.

Just wanted to let you know that Dare da is the Japanese version, and Who's That Pokémon is the English version. Why you're putting the Japanese title on the English images, I don't know. But I've removed them. ^★Jo the Marten^★ ಠ_ಠ ♥ 04:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit: I realize now it was just a mistake on EP012 that I saw. But I still don't think we need both titles. ^★Jo the Marten^★ ಠ_ಠ ♥ 04:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence?

There absolutely is evidence that Duskull's shiny color could possibly be a reference to Char Aznable. Would you like me to link videos of the movement of a Zaku's monoeye as well as show 3D sprites of Duskull so that you can compare the similarities? Did you read the article on Char Aznable that was linked, particularly the "Cultural impact" section? I'll add a link to the MS that Duskull's monoeye most resembles (namely the Char Custom version) if that pleases you. Also, don't forget, I'm not saying that there has been any confirmation of any sort that Duskull's shiny color is a reference to Char, just that it is a realistic possibility, especially seeing as liscensed "Char Custom" Nintendo products have been sold in the past. Here are two pages to give "evidence." Please note that the color scheme of the suits as well as the fact that the single, red eye can move from side to side in a manner similar to Duskull's. Here are pages for Char's Zaku and Char's Zgock. Is that enough evidence?Red Comet 00:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

How are wikia sites reliable?--SandmanDP 00:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Ignoring the irony of that question, The reliability of the pages themselves isn't nescessarily why I linked them, it was the image in the upper right corner of each page, so that you can take note of the color scheme and eyes of the mobile suits in question. For a slightly more reliable source, information about how widely known he is in Japan and also the tendency for him to be referenced due to red recolors is on his page on Wikipedia. Red Comet 00:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

This website is independent, so there is no irony. You're calling upon opinion, which is not allowed--SandmanDP 00:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

All that the rules of style on this site say is when it comes to opinions is that there should be a contrasting opinion so as to prevent bias. Also, several other articles DO contain speculation, such as the origins of various Pokemon names. Red Comet 00:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Just stop--SandmanDP 00:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

For future reference on my part, I would appreciate it if you told me the difference between speculation as to the origin's of a pokemon's name and speculation as to the origins of a pokemon's shiny color, particularly when speculations as to the origins of its shiny color were already on the page before I made the edit, and are still there now that you undid the edit. - unsigned comment from Red Comet (talk • contribs)

Getting the NatDex in Pt

OK, you deleted my last section on here, and I realize that i might not have been to clear (and forgot to sign). But in my Platinum, I got a Manaphy from a friend and I don't have a Phione, and I cant get the Nat Dex. AND I have all the other Pokemon (as caught entries.) I don't want to edit war, so i'm not going to go revert it. I want to know why you think it's not true. Volcronaperson 02:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Because it was never necessary to have Phione--SandmanDP 02:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't have a caught or seen entry on Phione in Pt, still no NatDex. Volcronaperson 21:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The Preview button reminder

Just another reminder to use the preview button. You just made five edits in a row to a page which is frowned upon because it may cause server stress. Please try a little more to remember the preview button. Thanks for understanding! --Pokemaster 97 21:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Just another another reminder. You've made 2+ edits to multiple pages in a row, and that doesn't just cause server stress, it clogs up the Recent Changes too. Thanks! --Darth Zekrom 22:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I used the preview button. Two edits on a page is nothing to worry about--SandmanDP 23:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

This stops. Now.

You will stop your edit warring over the Who's That Pokémon/Dare da silliness right now. If a member of the editorial board tells you to stop doing something, you stop it. If you disagree with the decision, you may question it, but you do not continue making such changes in the meantime.

This is your warning. If you continue to edit war after this, you will be blocked. Good day. Bikini Miltank 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

WTF? I AM BEING THREATENED BECAUSE I WAS ADDRESSING AN INCONSISTENCY THAT WAS IMPROPERLY JUSTIFIED. There was NO REASON for me to be reverted in the first place. I was never told how I was straight out wrong. The fact that I have been treated like crap is an abomination and I want this addressed--SandmanDP 01:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

And you can address it by bringing up the matter with members of the editorial board. When you are told to stop doing something by an EB member, you stop doing it, then you can debate it with them if you so choose. In that order. Not the other way around. I'm sorry if you feel threatened by my language, but given that you refused to stop what you were doing despite more polite requests, I felt it was the only option.

Honestly, I don't much care about the subject matter of this edit war either way, but this wiki has rules, one of the most fundamental being that if someone more senior tells you not to do something, you don't do it. If you don't like this, there are other wikis out there which I'm sure would welcome your contributions. Bikini Miltank 01:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

You do not express that message by intimidation. Admins are PEOPLE, not gods. They are not perfect. I point out a mistake, and all of a sudden, rabbits don't have ears, because trying to correct it is treason. I have never EVER been given the benefit of the doubt, and imstead admins are intimidating me from expressing my beliefs or my rights as an encyclopedia editor. The intimidation stops now.--SandmanDP 01:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Firstly, the Code of Conduct for this wiki specifically states that disputes should be settled on talk pages, not with edit warring. You should have obeyed the rules and engaged in a discussion about this before making the changes. While I can accept that, perhaps, you felt the changes didn't need to be discussed, as soon as a member of the editorial board objected to them, that was your cue to stop. You don't get to circumvent the rules no matter how right you think you are.

Secondly, editing this wiki is not a right. It is a privilege, and it is only due to a significant degree of leniency on the part of the mods that you still have that privilege. Don't squander it. Bikini Miltank 02:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I did engage in conversation on the talkpage first. I did not start the war. Apparently every administrator is overlooking that in regards to me. first. K-G did NOT use the talkpage. You still ignore the fact that the COC also says intimidation is a blockable offense. I'll use your very applicable words against you: Editing, and in your case, administrating this wiki is not a right. It is a privilege, and it is only due to a significant degree of leniency on the part of the mods that you still have that privilege. Don't squander it--SandmanDP 02:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

It is absolutely a privilege, yes. A privilege granted to me and to others because we were deemed trustworthy and responsible. If you feel that I'm abusing this privilege, you may take it up with the Editor-in-Chief. Bikini Miltank 02:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey There!

Hey there fellow Poképal! Ok,straight to the subject.I would like to know why do you keep deleting my edits made in the Trivia section of AG174 and AG159.They are both correct and true. --DJWolfy. 13:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

They are incorrect. You said it was one of the FEW episodes that Team Rocket didn't blast off. 60 episodes of the Best Wishes would like to have a word with you. In other words, it may be correct, but it's not noteworthy--SandmanDP 16:51, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I said it is one of the few when one of its memebers,there one remains while the other two blast off.Now tell me if this is common?

----DJ Wolfy 17:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Many of them said "This is one of the few episodes where Team Rocket didn't blast off", or something like it. Besides, It's not like it was a failed blastoff where it aimed for three and only got two. The plot made it so that it was impossible to have all three blast off. It's obvious, not trivial--SandmanDP 17:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

It is still trivial because Team Rocket blasting off with all 3 memembers is very common prior to Best Wishes.And it doesn't matter if the plot made it or not,the same thing happens during Grand Festivals or Championships.So a two member blast off is trivial.----DJ Wolfy 17:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

So you reaffirm what I said that them not blasting off in an episode is not trivial. And no, plot DOES make your trivia non-trivial.--SandmanDP 20:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Whatever,be it as you wish.----DJ Wolfy 20:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok,trivia problem again ? What was wrong with Trivia?----DJ Wolfy 20:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Tracey's VA

Undo revision 1604414 by Satoshi101 (talk) (we list Natochenny and That's TPCI)

OK, first of all, Craig only voiced him in one ep. If you noticed with Ash, we don't list Jamie Peacock because she just voiced him in the Mirage Pokémon episode. Second of all, Craig is no longer on the show. If you don't agree with this system, then take it up with Kenji-girl, she's the one that suggested it. I'm telling you right now so I don't end up in edit war and get blocked. Thank you. サトシ 23:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Evidence Blair left please... Besides, if Tracey had made more appearances in the TPCI era, you can't count him out. After all, it'd mean removing Misty's voice actress for MMOP, because Misty hasn't appeared at all vocally since then. Your case makes no sense--SandmanDP 00:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Maybe This will help! And Tracey hasn't had any speaking appearances since then (when Blair voiced him) either. サトシ 00:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Preview Button Again

I see there is a segment earlier on this page asking you to use the preview button more often to not clog up the Recent Changes. I see you still edit pages several times in a row. Instead of editing small segments at a time, use "edit this page" at the top of articles so you can make all the changes in one go rather than just doing small segments. Thank You. Frozen Fennec 15:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Just Letting You Know..

It seems like you are editing pages section by section with several small edits. You can edit all of the sections in one go by clicking on the main green "Edit" tab located on the top of the page. This way you can make less edits and still edit what you want. This will hopefully stop all of the preview button reminders you've been getting on your page. Have a good day! --Pokemaster 97 23:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

It's difficult to do so on a cellphone or 3DS. On the 3DS, I risk wiping out a majority of the page if it's a big one. On an iPhone, it would mean long and tedious scrolling. I hope you understand now--SandmanDP 23:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Error

Okay, you're using two examples to support that the error should not be listed: the Togepi one, and the Tangela one. However, there is a major difference between those and the error on the back of the book: those are only incorrect by information that we KNOW now. It's only speculation to say that only 3 books were planned, no official source said only 3 were planned, but official sources did know that Tangela couldn't evolve at the time. This means that your argument for its removal is in a couple ways wrong, and it should be kept. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 23:17, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, but we also know now that there are 8 books. Did buyers know that there would be a fourth after reading that blurb?--SandmanDP 23:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

That is true, but no official sources stated there would only be 3 books, just the back. I understand what you're saying, but let's say that someone new to the series sees the fan with a plan episode. How are they supposed to know that Arbok does not evolve into Seviper? Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 23:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Never mind, saw the compromise. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 23:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Admin,

Why, exactly, were my edits taken down? Did they suck? BurgundyUnicorn 00:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)BurgundyUnicorn

SandmanDP is not an administrator. For a list of Bulbapedia Staff please go here. --Pokemaster 97 00:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

And I'm not the one who took down your edits--SandmanDP 00:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Errors & Events

I am not repeatedly linking it to the move errors. It's just a note. If you scroll over it, it doesn't link it to anything. The link to the anime move error page has been gotten rid of. Please don't accuse me of things I didn't do. ^-^; We already went over this before on the talk page, and even though everything was sorted out, you still continue to go on about this. Now, 'cannot normally learn' says that the Riolu species cannot normally learn Aura Sphere. However, that Riolu is special because it can. The event Riolu comes from the Fiore region and is transferred to the Sinnoh region by a Pokemon Ranger game. However, that Riolu spent its whole life in the Sinnoh region. It itself is not an event Pokemon. It is just a Pokemon that knows a special attack. Like a shiny Pokemon, in a sense. It isn't an event Pokemon in the anime, it's just a special one. Littlmiget123 15:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

You are flat out lying. I saw the coding. Please stop. You are completely disregarding what Kenji-girl said on the Anime move errors talkpage, and she's the head of Project Anime--SandmanDP 15:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

There is no coding. Look at the parts in red. Do you see a link to the Anime move errors page? There is nothing. You are thinking that I'm adding in some hidden thing. I know what Kenji-Girl said, but you reverted my edit for nothing. Why would I lie to you when someone can just go back in the history and see that it's there? And just so you know, I'm talking about the edit from just a few moments ago, not a few days ago. That's already been settled. I really don't appriciate being called a liar, because there's no reason for me to lie. I've laid down facts, but you've completely disregarded them. Littlmiget123 15:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Manga section, miss. You still made sure to put the link. You pointed to your own evidence of fib. Vuvu even mentioned what kind of implications you gave--SandmanDP 15:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Previously one of them did link to Anime Move Errors. He reverted it, I've fixed it up though. While it is a move they can only learn through an event. It is still a move they cannot normally learn. Frozen Fennec 15:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

It's not wrong when all other move pages say that for not so normal Pokémon who were able to learn it. Please stop reverting the edit. Frozen Fennec 16:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Stop reverting me. You're only trying to make trouble--SandmanDP 16:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

I did not see the manga error. But that wasn't my doing. Why would I link a manga section to an anime move error? The anime and manga are two completely different things. I didn't see that I was reverting the manga section, I was just looking at the anime. But you're still missing the big picture here, Sandman. Yes, it isn't an error, but they still cannot normally learn it. Also, until this issue is sorted out, please stop going around and changing it. It will be counted as an edit war, and if you continue to do so while we are talking about it, I will report you to an admin. Littlmiget123 16:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

You did do so, so stop harassing me and threatening me when you're the one who invoked an edit war. Vuvuzela2010 is the one who tried to stop it and you defied him to continue the edit war.--SandmanDP 16:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

I did not threaten anyone. I just simply said that if you didn't stop adding onto the edit war while we're talking about this, then I'd have to report you. Which you continued to do. I've been on this website for four years, so I wouldn't add on to an edit war. You're bringing in a completely different topic that was already settled as your argument. I admit I made a mistake with the manga section, because I did not see it when I reverted it; I just saw the anime section. But you're not listening to reason. Just please calm down and read what I have written. I am not trying to attack you in any way, nor am I angry or anything. I am just simply showing you why I think you shouldn't revert my edits. ^-^; Littlmiget123 16:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

I think I should make it clear that I wasnt fully aware that there was an edit war going on before (or that another was going to happen after I edited Aura Sphere). I was merely showing an alternative way of describing the note. I never stated that Littlmidget himself was giving any implications, only the text, and I was not trying to stop another user. And the re-adding of the move error link to the manga section by Littlmidget was clearly an accident. Until it is agreed that the note shoulf be changed, it will have to stay the way it is for now. Also, please do not remove any more comments from this talk page. If you feel that they are inflammatory, then you can take it up with the Editorial Board, but they do not seem offensive to me. XVuvuzela2010X 17:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

"It will be counted as an edit war, and if you continue to do so while we are talking about it, I will report you to an admin"... how is that not inflammatory? It's a clear and blatant threat that violates the code of conduct--SandmanDP 17:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

My Johto edit

Hi, I saw that you removed my edit in the Johto Trivia section. I don't speak English as well as I would like, because I am Spanish. I don't know if you understood what I wanted to explain in this trivia... Sorry. --JaVi 17:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Grammatically incorrect seemingly pointless but either way unnotable trivia--SandmanDP 17:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Links

Hey Poképal.Good job with your new userpage!Btw how did you manage to change that grey colour into white ? the one in which is the "Informative Gulletcream".Also I fixed your userpage a bit cause the "Talk Page" and "Contributions" on the template linked to my sites.They now link to yours. And btw I suggest using this template as it represent better your country (the colour plus eagle).

	This user comes from the United States.

You can only see it in editing mode.

----DJ Wolfy 00:09, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

So how did you manage to change the colour of the "Informative Gulletcream"?----DJ Wolfy 00:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

1 M, 1 W, 1 D, 1 H

Here we are again. I know you won't like this, but that's ok because I have a long list who don't particularly like you right now. Let me break this down for you:

1 hour so you can cool down. Clearly you're not being very level headed right now.
1 day for removing info on Werdnae's talk page, which you had no right to do (it doesn't break any rules).
1 week equaling every day this week I logged on and heard that you had antagonized someone, or gotten someone upset, or were involved in another edit war. You need to grow up and stop being immature. On your logic, if someone doesn't agree with you, they're an enemy. No one is your enemy, except yourself.
1 month because you can't seem to stop edit warring. Even if I think you're right, you can't seem to discuss anything with people without making an argument about it. If someone wants to revert you, take it to a talk page, and talk about it. If the person is belligerent, you get an admin. Stop trying to take these things into your own hands.

If you don't calm down, then next time, you are done. You have good intentions, I know you want to improve the site, and I know you want to be a good editor. You have the right mindset, but you have the wrong attitude. I can't count how many alerts I've gotten over the past weeks about a problem user on the site, and the subject of each of them were you. And before you think the staff are targeting you, that certainly isn't the case, you just have the ability to create such a fanfare, all the attention gets directed at you. If this were a circus, you'd be center ring, but this isn't, its a wiki, and we have work to do. -- MAG NE DETH 03:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Blasting off and motto category

Please keep in mind that Deputy EiC told you that the staff would be making a decision about how to handle those episodes. Until the decision is made, please do not take the project on in your own hands. Thank you. --ケンジの ガール 05:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)