Talk:Main Page/Archive 7

This is the talk page for the Bulbapedia's front page. If you have a general comment about the wiki, please consider placing it in our forum.

Previous discussions

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3
• Archive 4
• Archive 5
• Archive 6

So featured articles...

Well, our current one's been up for more than a week, so I'm wondering...

1. Ought we get a new one (aka, oh... Ash?) out there?
2. Should we have some sort of regular schedule to the featuring?
3. Will you guys ever nominate and vote on them quickly enough to feature them weekly? Monthly? Bi-monthly? How often?
4. And if not... well, when should we go back to the normal MftE? TTEchidna 04:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I think if it's simple enough to nominate articles, then we could see more use from this. I had to dig a bit through the links to find the other nominations... would a simple "Nominate an article" link next to the "read more" and "more featured articles" links be a good idea, perhaps? We could have an article with not only a list of nominations, but some simple instructions for how to nominate. Make it more accessible. We've got plenty of articles to nominate, not enough people looking for them.

At this rate, a once-a-month nomination might work out nicely. With more activity, I'd say nominating faster then that would be nice. I personally think having featured articles is a fun thing, MftE makes for a good news feed, but that's about it. Featured articles give the front page more... appeal. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 08:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I completely agree. Monthly featuring would work great, and it makes the main page look much better. And if on one of the months we don't have a new one, we can use Poké Ball or Legendary Pokémon, since they never made it to the main page, right? And there are already many good nominees. --electAbuzzzz ^(TALK) 08:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

So we choose the next on the 21st? TTEchidna 23:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

We can choose the next one whenever, I'd say. Then start up a cycle starting there. It's not a big deal if Brock gets featured for a little longer or shorter then the other featured articles we'll inevitably have. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 06:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Or, either just wait until one comes again, and base a cycle on that time, or leave it up for a month, then take it down, and post a new one whenever a new one comes. Theininen 18:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Move updating

We shouldn't count Struggle, Super Glitch, Secret Power (it doesn't need the template) and Vacuum-Cut as moves, so should we subtract 4 from that? However, we SHOULD count Wide Slash as a move, because in MD it's a TM. TorchicBlaziken 16:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

There are 467 moves minus Super Glitch, Vacuum-Cut, and Wide Slash. I went by the in-game DP number. Secret Power and Struggle... well, yeah. TTEchidna 19:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The ads...

I don't like the way they work. The ads-well, just look at them! They make this site seem less trustable, and especially since it's like "REGISTER OR BE FORCED TO LOOK AT WEIRD ADS!!!!" I like that I don't have to look at them, now I'm a member, but I don't think that this site should be sponsored by cleavage revelations. TorchicBlaziken ^(talk) 23:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I was looking at my own talk without being logged on, and I had to keep above the ad at the bottom so my mom wouldn't see it. Theininen 01:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

You can report those sorts of ads on the forums... TTEchidna 06:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Featuring

Why has the featured article been about Brock all the time? - Hazardous FIRE! 05:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Because it never changed; this is the first one. We're not going to be changing them every day like Wikipedia is...I think the consensus is change it every month?--Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 05:53, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

The discussion's a few sections up on this page, and yep, seems to be about once-a-month. We don't really have a need to feature an article every day, besides, we'd run out of articles too quick if we did that. And featuring for a longer time gives the articles more "airtime". -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 16:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

RRRRGH!!!

Those new sprite tables are all wrong! Every time you click "show", the evolution chart sticks itself smack in the middle of it! NOT GOOD! I'm Missingno. Master, and I approve this message. 01:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Works perfectly fine for me. Mind giving a link to a page it doesn't work on, and listing what browser you use? Different browsers handle some codes differently, and it would be in our best interest to make sure Bulbapedia works on most of them. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 06:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Me as well. I know you've got an affinity for glitches, but IE... TTEchidna 06:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Me too, I've noticed some pages work while some don't--Wowy 07:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

It works fine for me, but somebody else is having a problem. 23-03-33 made a post here, along with a screencap what exactly it's doing. --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 23:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Grammar...

Umm...it's in the "Did You Know" is supposed to be its...I'm not sure how to edit that section, but in the future, can people check the grammar just in case? ht14 12:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Serebii

Serebii.net has like bucket-fulls of new info about the rotom formes and other stuff, shouldnt this be added to the main page? --Hey1031 20:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Platinum is out?

I thought that it was coming out on the 13th. But a bunch of videos are appearing on Youtube right now. Just look at them all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4kPiOdfY7Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGVCgkQt6W0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL0Oz7HBE70

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU --Posted by Deadlymethane at 00:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, Apparently people are saying that internet celebs get it first to review it, but I really dont know what to believe any more, but in any case, some people out there have it now as I type this. --Hey1031 00:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

It's just a leaked ROM. This happened back when DP came out in English too, remember?--Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 04:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

How is that possible? You can clearly see that the videos are from DSs. Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 02:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I just got ricl rolled by the last video XD--DCM_{((TalkContributions))}

It is either a leaked ROM, or one of the copys that some shops sold early. -Rabla 22:26, 13 September 2008

Pokemon Platinum Sprites

I found where all (almost) of the Pokemon Platinum sprites are. They are here: http://sfc.pokemon-inside.net/platinum.php [b]Evil Sonic....[/b] 02:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Some of them look fake to me. --ケンジのガール 02:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Yea like Chancey and Blissey--☆Coolピカチュウ! 02:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

No, those are them all right. Zhen sent me them and they are exactly those (minus the glitchy ones, which someone screwed up). TTEchidna 03:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Roselia's face looks weird. --ケンジのガール 23:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

If I have nightmares tonight, I know who to blame. What did they do to Raichu! they ruined my favorite Pokemon! NOOOOOOOO! --Mooites ^{Talk to me, baby!} 23:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Bring back Crystal.

As long as we're talking about sprites, I'm still not sure about the files we should be uploading. Are we going to animate everything, nothing, Platinum only, or what? --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 23:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

My Pokemon Ranch and Platinum

It's been revealed on the Pokemon Ranch Japanese site that a Pokemon Platinum compatibility update will be available by the end of the year. Those that have the game already will be able to download the update for free when it's available.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 03:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank goodness. TTEchidna 03:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Yup know i don't have to buy Wii Points.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

IMPORTANT s' v s's posessive update

Go here [1]--KukiTalk 14:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

That's a celebrity blog. Blogs are prone to grammar errors, just as much as a wiki is. This blog can't be used as evidence in this debate. If you thought a celebrity blog could get us off our stance of keeping them at "James's", you're dead wrong.

The articles stay at the names they currently have. If we've rejected certain schoolbooks, there's no way we'd fall prey to a blog. --Shiningpikablu252 15:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I thought this issue was already discussed. Besides, if we did change, do you realize how much of a massive undertaking that would be? We not only would have to alter all articles belonging to James, we'd have to fix up some templates (like {{op}}) and go through every article trying to determine if it's correct. --PAK Man ^Talk 15:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Excellent point. And in my opinion it's such a minute detail to have such a debate over it. Gligar 21:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Look, we know that s' is considered the proper. The problem is that it would mess up all the templates we have. Such as {{TP|James|Mime Jr.}}. The template won't work correctly if it's James' Mime Jr. instead. So will you stop bringing this up already? It's impossible to have it this way. We are not doing it to piss users off. --ケンジのガール 21:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Actually, no, the s' would be wrong. You put the apostrophe after the s only if it's a plural noun. If James was the plural form of Jame, then it would be appropriate, but since he's one guy, it's James's. --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 22:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Everyone has disagreements on pluralizing singulars ending with "S". The only agreement seems to be Jesus and Moses use "s' " for whatever reason.--Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 22:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Cross was s'--KukiTalk 22:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

The s' is not the proper way, no more than not beginning a sentence with and. TTEchidna 22:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Kuki, some random blog using "s' " doesn't make it correct. Go bring us a document on the proper use of English to support your argument.--Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 22:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Technically sayin James' and James's means the same thing Dion24 23:38, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

...that's not the point.--Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 23:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Problem with Platinum-move-standardizing

Big problem: Say someone standardizes half of the learnsets in a move and forgets about it. It is put under Platinum standard and no one will know the other half is done. What do we do, manually check every move article? Gligar 21:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

It's up to the person editing to remember to complete it later. If they don't, we'll find it eventually, just like we do all mistakes in the articles, and can take care of it then. --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 21:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)