Talk:Aurora Veil (move)

Generation 7 Pokemon

Is it worthwhile to note that no Pokemon introduced in Generation 7 can learn Aurora Veil despite the move being introduced in Generation 7? Scribbl 05:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the precedent is that it isn't considered notable. I can't remember the exact page, but I remember one from Generation 6 that was like that, for which the trivium was removed. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 05:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

I saw the same trivia for Quash, saying no generation V Pokemon could learn it despite being introduced in generation V, so I thought it would be relevant here. Scribbl 05:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Gigantamax Lapras?

Is there a rule that says we're not allowed to do any of the following:

• State outright that Gigantamax Lapras can effecitively do a slightly better version of this move (because it is part of G-Max Resonance, and no hail required)?
• Include G Max Resonance in the little thing (below Translations) that says "Variations of the move Light Screen" and presently only shows three moves

If not against the rules I suggest doing at least one of the above. Mrob27 (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

For the former, it might be worth mentioning in the trivia section of this article that another move can set up the same effect.

For the latter, G-Max Resonance is not a variation of Light Screen because it's not a status move. See move variations for more details on what counts a move variation. --SnorlaxMonster 13:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

If it's trivia then I guess it's not worth it. Mrob27 (talk) 13:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Is this trivia worthy?

Is it worth mentioning that Amaura and Aurorus, despite having Snow Warning for an ability, can't learn Aurora Veil? Technically Snover can't learn it either, but Abomasnow can. --PKMNAdventurer (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)