Talk:Caught Pokémon

Move to "Caught Pokémon"

The concept of a "captured Pokémon" is exclusive to the Ranger games. In the main series, they always refer to it as "catching." I know, the difference between "capturing" and "catching" is minimal, but that's how the terminology seems to work. So very stupid. Anyway, if there are no objections, I'd like to move the page. --((Marton imos)) 17:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree with this move for the reasons Martonimos stated. ~ solaris 19:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Voting for the page move, catching is a better term here. UltimateSephiroth ^{(about me · chat · edits)} 22:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I planned to give this five days to see if anyone would complain. It's now been closer to seven, and nobody's come to say "no," so I guess I'll move it. --((Marton imos)) 04:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Capture vs Caught

Anyone have the original Japanese terms for these? --Manga-in-a-bottle 04:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

The Japanese term is just called "GET". --ケンジのガール 04:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

In both Ranger and the main games? --Manga-in-a-bottle 04:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't know about Ranger. Just the main games for sure. --ケンジのガール 04:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Animedex

While I did put None under the Pokémon header, I was wondering if Wild Pokémon would be better for it? — Reshi643 08:42, 29 August 2013 (UTC)