Template talk:Ash's Pokémon

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Ash's Primeape

I don't think that it is appropriate to consider him "in training" because Ash's page says he is released, because he cannot be called upon at any time like Charizard and Squirtle can. So, I am going to revert to the version by Pie. I know that in Spurt he appears with Ash's Oaked Pokemon, but he does not fit the definition of in training. Briememory 20:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Just because Ash never has called on Primeape doesn’t mean he can’t. In the dub, he leaves it to be trained into a P1 champion. Unless he specifically gives it away in the Japanese version, it is technically his Pokémon just as much as the other two. --WikidSmaht 22:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Aipom

Since we're pretty sure it evolves soon... what does everyone think of on Ash's template? He traded it as an Aipom, not Ambipom, so I think it should stay as "Aipom" on this template, but link to Dawn's Ambipom. Of course, this shall be WHEN the evolution happens. TTEchidnaFire echyGSDS! 00:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I think it should be Ambipom. --File:Spr 3e 059.gifFile:Spr 3e 132.gifTheryguy512 File:Trozeiani025.gif 01:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
It was always an Aipom under Ash, so I'm leaning towards that. The same should apply to Paul and Chimchar when that evolution happens. --FabuVinny T-C-S 01:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Lara Laramie's Rapidash

Since Ash used Lara's Rapidash for a race, should Rapidash go under Temporary with Seaking? - unsigned comment from Chosen (talkcontribs)

That was borrowed for a competition. Ash never caught it or used it in battle. He just sat on it. I say it doesn't count TheAlmightyChris 20:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Then shouldn't it be in a new section called 'Loaned to'?--KukiTalk 21:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Mankey...

Well, question. It links to a freaking disambig. TTEchidna 03:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

What, I had it link to the Mankey! MoldyOrange 04:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Templates?

Wouldn't it be better to use Template:AP than Template:TP? I'm putting this on the talk page since I'm not sure if there was a specific reason for using this template and not the other... - spontaneousCombusken 04:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

It should be AP. The reason it was done with TP is because the AP template didn't exist at the time (I know, cause I'm the one who did it...) Anyway, I'll change it now. --ElectAbuzzzz 12:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Maybe this should get locked. You know, the whole Chimmy thing.

I'd do it myself, but I was stripped of the ability to do so. :\ ~Toastypk - Loom. 16:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)