Talk:Glitzer Popping
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Move?
I feel Glitzer Popping is a nice name but it doesn't have any meaning in itself. I'm wondering whether the page should be moved to something with substantive meaning like "Pomeg corruption glitch" (with a note that the glitch is also called Glitzer Popping) like how the article Johto guard glitch recently got moved to Time Capsule exploit. For what it's worth the work in progress 52Poké Wiki article also seems to call this "full box of Bad Eggs glitch" (满箱的坏蛋漏洞). --Chickasaurus (talk) 13:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- In fact I'm the editor of that page in Chinese... Now I'm translating this article into Chinese in my user page (zh:User:Xzonn/Glitzer Popping), and I don't know how to properly translate the title "Glitzer Popping", for it doesn't have any meaning. So I use a name “满箱的坏蛋漏洞” in Chinese (just means "full box of Bad Eggs glitch" as you translated). I think that moving this page to another proper name will help new players understand this glitch more.——xzonn(Guestbook) 14:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- I see, nice to meet you! Yeah, I have similar feelings about this. If the title describes what the glitch is this is more user friendly for people wanting to learn about what the glitch is about. --Chickasaurus (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nice to meet you too. In fact, I knew neither of the two words at first, so I looked them up in a dictionary... Maybe this page should move to a proper name.——xzonn(Guestbook) 05:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- When I mention "Glitzer Popping" in english, I now use the expression "Pomeg Glitch Data Corruption", as it is an use of Pomeg Glitch that corrupts data (with many roots that go from it thanks to Pokémon Corruption and ...). I had a similar talk with other people and they were proposing to use "Pomeg Berry Glitch" for the usual glitch, and "Pomeg Glitch"/"Complete Pomeg Glitch". It can still be confusing to some people, but I hardly have better names than these. Metarkrai (talk) 17:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- I see, nice to meet you! Yeah, I have similar feelings about this. If the title describes what the glitch is this is more user friendly for people wanting to learn about what the glitch is about. --Chickasaurus (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- I know that it's been a while since this was posted, but this is still relevant. If nothing else, "Pomeg Glitch Data Corruption" and "Pomeg Data Corruption" should redirect back to this article. VolcanoCrafted82 (talk) 20:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)