User talk:Politoed666/Archive 3
This is a talk page archive.
It contains old discussions of topics relating to the user. Please do not add or remove any content from it. |
Signature
My signature is technically my username in greek. But if you wish it to be more understandable, I can change it~Ποκεμανιαχα0β 22:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Your signature is and has always been perfectly fine, there is no need to change it. Alternate languages is fine, or else people wouldn't be able to have Usernames in Kanji. So, don't change it! It is understandable the way it is. MoldyOrange 22:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what language it is, as long as SOMEONE can read it...hey, why am I talking to you on two different pages?--☆Tavisource 22:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Uh..i don't know. All I know that is I just changed my signature from Pokemaniach102 to Pokemaniak102~Ποκεμανιακα0β 22:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what language it is, as long as SOMEONE can read it...hey, why am I talking to you on two different pages?--☆Tavisource 22:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Correction
It was Charizard, not the species article--KukiTalk 22:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, you're right. My bad. Doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things, though. --ニョロトノ666 22:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
True, but I just wated gto point it out. On a better topic, should we get young and present Yuri, and a pic of young Johanna?--KukiTalk 22:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Uh... what? Is this about, like, a Pokémon anime character or Yuri, the Japanese term used to refer to lesbian content? I know next to nothing about the anime, so another user, such as PAK Man or Fabu-Vinny would probably be a better bet. --ニョロトノ666 22:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Anime character in DP095--KukiTalk 23:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, then you're probably better off with someone else. I fail. --ニョロトノ666 23:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
POLIIIIII
I'm gonna kill you!
No, you, um, goofed up the route infobox color templates. You put a space between the <noinclude> and the end of the color code and that really screwed things up... TTEchidna 03:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the advice on contacting Zhen Lin for changing my Username. I'm sure I'll get a new User Name pretty soon. Say, did you get a User Name change, too? I'm surprised how you knew this and I didn't. Strange for a person that's already been here 3 months. --Juan Sanfiel (I like pie) 23:53 9 September 2008
- No problem. And no, I never have gotten a username change. However, some users who I've become friends with have, so I know the process. --ニョロトノ666 01:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Just a question
I don't really expect that I'll be chosen to be an admin (I would say it's unlikely since most of hereby admins hate me or have some kind of grudge against me). But I have one question to you. What does homophobe have to do with administratorship on a Pedia? Really, it's one of the most stupid "arguments" I heard in awhile. Not to mention I'm not a "homophobe". I would dispute about whether or not such thing as "homophobe" exists but it's a completely different topic so I'll leave it alone. --Maxim 09:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I knew someone would bring this up. Here's the deal; I believe you're a great user. You've been here a long time and haven't yet ditched us. However, you have a hot temper. Fix that, and you're good to go with more people than you are now. However, I have a problem with the fact that it says on your userpage that you are racist, "an enemy of atheism," and "an enemy of homosexuality." An admin needs to be unbiased and keep a level head, and someone with such radical opinions would have a problem being impartial involving such elements. I think it takes a good deal of maturity to admit that you don't expect administratorship ATM, and that speaks well for you should you be nominated again in the future. --ニョロトノ666 02:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Theme decks etc
There are a lot of theme decks and deck archetypes without pages. You seemed to be the person who added the most pages and info about them, do you know where I can find information on them? I think that they should have their articles created because there are a lot appearing on the wanted pages, and you were the person who added the most info on them. MoldyOrange 14:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I knew somebody would ask me about this at some point. :P Pokégym and Pokébeach are good for reading up on current archetypes, so you can take on a few articles if you feel like it. I was actually planning to do a bit of revitalizing on Project TCG sometime soon myself, so expect to see some more of the current archetypes get articles in the near future. --ニョロトノ666 02:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Lance's Dragonite
Which pic is better? The one from Rage of Innocence, or Scuffle of Legends? Jmath keeps reverting to former--KukiTalk 19:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Jesus... I'm sick of these image revery wars. Personally, I like Jmath's image better since it seems to be of better quality. However, it's stupidly titled and a little silly looking, so I guess I'm impartial. --ニョロトノ666 02:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Small Questions
First off, would you mind if I used your "Shipping is Bull" tag? And why do you think Garchomp is broken? -- MAGNEDETH 00:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- I would love it if you were to honor my awesome creativity and use my "Shipping is Bull" tag. As for why I think Garchomp is broken, it can learn a great variety of moves and has high stats. Also, I love the "land shark" concept. --ニョロトノ666 02:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- Anything I can do you pound it into anyone's head whom reads my page how much I hate shipping, I'm all for it. As for Garchomp, his move pool is no bigger than other pseudo-legends, but, he does have few resistances, good defense, and he's faster than most. Land Shark...hmm, I don't know, maybe I'm just making excuses because he's one of my all-time favorites...thanks for the tag though. -- MAGNEDETH 02:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
HEY POLI
Got AIM or an email? I need to talk to you 'bout something. TTEchidna 03:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
TCs
How do you count up edits for top contributors? --((Marton imos)) 04:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's a secret! --ニョロトノ666 20:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- You're not supposed to reveal the secreeeeet! TTEchidna 04:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Too late. Either take it away know before anyone bookmarks it :D.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 04:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Shh. You saw NOTHING. Either of you! Anyone who viewed this page and saw a link saw NOTHING. We don't access that page too often because it puts quite a bit of strain on the server, and we don't want everyone constantly checking out how they're doing on the TC page. TTEchidna 05:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Too late. Either take it away know before anyone bookmarks it :D.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 04:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- You're not supposed to reveal the secreeeeet! TTEchidna 04:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Dude
I don't wanna be harsh, but just because you don't think Pachirisulover12 should become an admin, it doesn't mean that you can force other people to vote the same way as you. I'm aware that you're an admin, but people have rights to their own opinions. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 18:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm not really trying to force other people to side with me. I guess it comes across that way, what with the thing I just added to my userpage, so I'll take that down so as not to convey the wrong message. In any case, see my apology to the people I got pissed at on Pachilover12's candidate page. --ニョロトノ666 18:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Please
Slow down on editing the User:
namespace. Editing your userpage too much will lead to it being locked again. Instead of making multiple small edits, why not instead use the preview button (Alt + Shift + P) to check your edits before saving the page? Thank you. --ニョロトノ666 18:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey
I guess congratulations are in order. I have to admit I was surprised (only because you're one of the newer admins), but you earned it. On a different note - I'm glad to see what I said made you restrain your campaign a little. I do agree the nominations have gone out of control and people shouldn't be nominated because they're nice. You'll have to agree that it is one of the requirements, though, right? Many good mainspace contributions is another requirement - but not the only one. The bottom line is, and we both know it (I'll allow myself to say that given how the only reason I didn't get adminship this week is my hiatus), that there are certain qualities needed that aren't measured in numbers. Anyway, congratulations and good luck. --electAbuzzzz 21:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks so much. I have to admit I was surprised by the invitation myself, but I think TTE made a good choice. :D In any case, I know there are good things not limited to numbers, but sometimes it does come down to numbers. I guess I am a bit of a stickler for edit quantities, though. I'll work on that. :D --ニョロトノ666 21:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Hiiiiiiiiiii! I am a 1-year+ guest and it feels good to be contributing..... SilverCharmeleon 04:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Unsure
I'm not so sure myself, I just protected both pages so this stupid conflict didn't continue. I was hoping that both would have a simple discussion about this on the talk page, but Pokemaniac disappeared and Sunain is nowhere to be found. I'm not sure about the legality of it, either. Looking at Sunain's talk page, she has gotten into conflicts before regarding translations. The thing that got me was when she said she didn't give Bulbapedia permission to use it, which is why I decided to end it. --PAK Man Talk 20:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Well...
Since you're a bureaucrat now (meaning you can assign user rights), can you make Martonimos an admin? It's been a month since he was nominated and he has a huge amount of supporting votes. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 20:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's really TTE's job to do that. The only time when I'd promote someone is in an emergency, such as a major vandal attack. The Editor-in-Chief (TTE) has the final say in a promotion, so he has to do the promoting. I think Martonimos can wait until tonight. --ニョロトノ666 20:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I asked TTE to do it. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 21:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Kuki/Blisselebi
I checked the e-mail addresses. Kuki is Futurecaster@gmail.com and Blisselebi is Futureblaster@gmail.com. Just wanted you to know how close they were and how much I think they are the same person. Do with the information as you will, it is in your hands now. MoldyOrange 21:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- It would also be the second time Kuki made another account when he was blocked. The first one was KUKI. That one was obvious. MoldyOrange 21:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Blisselebi already got blocked. And the E-mail thing could be a frame.--Kkllnn blastoise 21:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. Here's the reason I don't crack down hard on Kuki; I find it kind of neat in a way that he loves Bulbapedia so much that he can't wait out his block. Yes, multiple accounts are strictly prohibited, but losing Kuki would actually mean a lot of decent work gone down the drain. Kind of like how TTE blocked Livinlarge18's sockpuppet, but he let off Livinlarge with just a warning. In essence, I block the sock, but I let the user go with a reprimand. --ニョロトノ666 21:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- KUKI wasn't made when Kuki when blocked. KUKI was made when Kuki couldn't get back into his regular account because his mom changed his passwords. Just thought I'd come in and correct that. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 21:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I meant a block his his mom. But, I haven't really seen Kuki do that much good editing, yeah, he may ad pictures to characters of the day...but he also causes controversy when he tries to add one to an article with one already, he causes and lenghthens edit wars. He doesn't use correct grammar, and I have yet to find any "good editing" that has come out of him. MoldyOrange 21:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- KUKI wasn't made when Kuki when blocked. KUKI was made when Kuki couldn't get back into his regular account because his mom changed his passwords. Just thought I'd come in and correct that. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 21:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. Here's the reason I don't crack down hard on Kuki; I find it kind of neat in a way that he loves Bulbapedia so much that he can't wait out his block. Yes, multiple accounts are strictly prohibited, but losing Kuki would actually mean a lot of decent work gone down the drain. Kind of like how TTE blocked Livinlarge18's sockpuppet, but he let off Livinlarge with just a warning. In essence, I block the sock, but I let the user go with a reprimand. --ニョロトノ666 21:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Blisselebi already got blocked. And the E-mail thing could be a frame.--Kkllnn blastoise 21:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Gender
Regarding the genders, what about Tate and Liza? Label them as both? ht14 21:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Un-abuse Broken Motor
He is not yet allowed to be counted to abuse. He only did eight edits, you move them to abuse only after 12 a day. The rules for that is on the fourth, add the first warning. On the fourth after the first warning, add the second. On the fourth after the third warning, add the third. On the fourth after the fourth warning, ban hammer! He only made it to the second and shouldn't have been on abuse. MoldyOrange 23:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Uh... alright, I'll remove him from abuse. However, the editorial board needs to have a little talk about why the hell a user can make five times as many edits as they're supposed to before it's grounds for abuse. Also, where exactly is the policy written? I can't seem to find it... --ニョロトノ666 23:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Requests
Can you please protect my newest talk page archive? Also, can you add {{TalkArchive}}
to this one? I forgot to add it when I archived. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 23:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
10/18
Sadly, I won't be here. But just so you know, Darkrai breeder's block doesn't run out til the twenty seventh, so he can't really do anything. MoldyOrange 01:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Two words; local library. :D And, they may be running on a proxy server or have sockpuppets waiting to be used. In any case, I don't think they're smart enough to accomplish anything significant. --ニョロトノ666 01:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Your revert
Thanks. :) I'm still getting used to things at this wiki, so it'll take some time. Feel free to revert anything I do wrong! Cheers, – RyanCross (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- And for some reason, I put "your wiki" in the edit summary... – RyanCross (talk) 01:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
By the way, is there a place here where I can post a problem that I think needs attention? I can't seem to find some sort of page to do that. – RyanCross (talk) 02:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- You can put it on the forums, whose link is on the left side bar. But, say your problem here first, maybe we can solve it here. MoldyOrange 02:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if you have a technical problem with coding or something, try TTEchidna or Shiningpikablu252. If you have any other kind of problem, simply either ask me or another admin. Personally, I'm tied with a few other people for the most powerful people on here except for TTE, the Editor-in-Chief. We make up the Editorial board. We're basically the policy makers, and at least one of us will know the answer to pretty much any question you ask. So, if it's a quick question, just ask one of us. If it's a question about the general 'pedia system or whatnot, try making an account on the Bulbagarden forums and starting a thread here. --ニョロトノ666 02:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Alright. Should a mainspace article like MOS redirect to the projectspace page, BP:MOS? I don't think this should really be done since a it's in the mainspace, IMO. If it shouldn't be done, can an administrator delete it? Thanks, – RyanCross (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- In this case, yes, since the MoS is such a notable page. And, since TTE created it, it stays. What he says goes. :D --ニョロトノ666 02:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
[no subject]
hey it's not terue Pokémon do not talk like that, they talk like Pokémon. I will add stuff to the page. if you give me some leeway I will make better - unsigned comment from GoldsWigglytuff (talk • contribs)
- Dude. Not how you add comments to talk pages. And, we have a bit of a thing about adding anything that's not proven on here. Even if you thing it's clear that they do "speak," I don't think it's really solid enough. --ニョロトノ666 17:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
it's ok. I am doing the page agan but this time I will have some provfGoldsWigglytuff 17:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Fantina Question
I can't ask TTEchidna because his page is un-editable (I think). So I'll ask you if it's okay. Um... Does it make any constellation that Fantina's DP gym was filled of mostly children trainers and the French word, enfantin, means "childish/childlike" which enfantin sounds alot like Fantina? Also, Fantina in my opinion, may be a reference to Sophie Blanchard who was an aeronaut who worked with hot air ballons, which Fantina has a Drifblim. Rpp 00:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- As for the former, I'd say it would be alright to add that to here name origin section. The latter is coincidental and far-fetched, so leave that out. --ニョロトノ666 00:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I was just stating the similarities. But okay. Thanks. Rpp 00:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Wait. How's this? "Her name may also come from "enfantin" because her Gym trainers are mostly children." Rpp 00:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Rpp
Jason
Have talked to him yet?--☆Coolピカチュウ! 00:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. I'm just waiting for him to reply with his answers to the questions I asked. --ニョロトノ666 00:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Dark Tyranitar Deck (TCG)
Since Dark Tyranitar (TCG) is just a redirect to this, and the deck's name is actually "Dark Tyranitar", do you reckon we'd be okay to move the article to where the redirect is? Cipher (Talk) 20:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, what I'd prefer is converting Dark Tyranitar (TCG) be converted to what it should be, a redirect to Tyranitar (TCG)#Dark Tyranitar. We can have the "If you were looking for..." message there for the deck, just to be safe. I'll take care of it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. --ニョロトノ666 01:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Jason
You already uploaded a picture of him at 03:27, 18 August 2008. We don't need two, so I am deleting the old one. MoldyOrange 02:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ah. I forgot about that. Feel free to delete the old one. My bad. --ニョロトノ666 02:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Pikablu said to ask you
Is there anything else that we would be able to put on each GB Decks page? Look here for what I have already. I think it looks a little empty, but I can't think of anything else, and I was hoping you would be able to. MoldyOrange 19:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm... frankly, although it seems I should be able to, I can't seem to think of anything. I'll let you know if I do, though. --ニョロトノ666 00:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I did not know!
I did not know! ~~UserSabata414~~
- Yeah, that's why you're not being penalized, as I explicitly stated on your talk page. First offense, not a big issue. By the way, sign your comments with four tildes, like this: ~~~~. --ニョロトノ666 00:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey dude
I just posted a comment on TTE's talk page asking him to restore something that was deleted un-fairly, but I noticed you're on right now, so can you read what I wanted him to resote and then do it? --Chocolate 00:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- holy crap? are you going to bother every admin about this?!!? it isnt needed. deal with it. -- MAGNEDETH 00:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Dude WTF?
Why did you protect my talk page? --Chocolate 01:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I protected it for 30 seconds because I got, like, four edit conflicts and knew that I would get another one before I got my say in the issue, so I abused my administrative powers and made sure I was able to post my comment without any more issues. --ニョロトノ666 01:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Nice work on the Userspace page
Now all we need to do is include a link to it in the welcome template. Can you do this?--RexRacer -talk 02:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
hmmm....
Official policy from the Editorial Board huh? That does not sound correct, since I made the policy and yours truly is not a member of the EB. But anyway, I wanted to point out the irony to you, even though you won't get this message til tomorrow, lol. MoldyOrange 02:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops, you're right. I fixed it. Sorry about that. :P Oh, and I decided to stay on for a few more minutes, so I got the message today. :D --ニョロトノ666 02:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
I AM NOT A SHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I AM NOT A SHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pokémon 17:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)User:Sabata414pokémon 17:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
reason i said that was beacause you called me a she on my user talk page pokémon 18:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)User:Sabata414
Thanks...
Hey, thanks for trying, but apparently no one cared enough about my adminship request to vote. I'll probably just go back to once in a blue moon editing now. I do appreciate your effort though. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah... no problem. I'm a little disappointed that users are valuing "friendlyness" and "helpfulness" above traits that actually make a good admin, such as knowledge of coding and willingness to do the little things that make a difference. So, see you around, I guess! --ニョロトノ666 22:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Chocolate
he wrote "Blazevoir for the win" and I deleted it as it was spam then he gave me a warning, he has already been in trouble numerous times and didnt like me enforcing the rules, I have reported him to TTE just now as Chocolates behaviour is unacceptable and is showing a clear disregard for the rules. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Guardian, I changed my comment so it's not spam. Happy now?! --Chocolate 22:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Re:Let's talk
But anyways, I'm sorry if you don't like it, but many people turn to me for things. I'm kinda here just to keep the custom sprites going and help out people who are having trouble. When people are having trouble and you don't even know them, where's the place to talk?...the talk page! But at least I'm not the one going around talking to people deliberately for no important reason. People actually come to me...look at my talk page! That was ONE month. I'm just not good on the mainspace, although I fix some mistakes now and then, I'm really not the kind of person who is good at writing encyclopedia articles. Everytime I write stuff, they end up to be pages and pages long...yes i'm a writer that has trouble keeping his things short. But back on topic, so I'm not good for the mainspace, right? Well, is it a problem to help others to help the main space? You won't believe it, but I have LOTS of e-mails from random people on Bulbapeida...and that keeps me busy enough. (don't forget aobut my talk page either). And if all this doesn't convince you, I'll come to the point to ask, "Is there a rule saying I NEED to contribute to the mainspace more?"....no, I mean it, is there? It says to contribute to the main space ADEQUATELY, not FREQUENTLY. And I was about to ask you anyways, is it worth it to create a page where we can help new users of Bulbapedia to adapt to the rules and stuff? I made half of the page but didn't save it yet...I'm just gonna ask you before I save it.--☆Tavisource 00:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- And...why did you move my page to the user space? I thought I had discussed this already...and yes, with an admin.--☆Tavisource
- I'll discuss it with him. In addition, I guess it's currently correct that there's nothing in writing against Talk Page abuse. But there should be. When Bulbapedia:Talk Page abuse turns blue, you'll know there is. --ニョロトノ666 01:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Block times
Chocolate was blocked for two hours...why did you need to undo his block? Couldn't he have waited about 25 more minutes, was he that desperate? And also, blocks under one week are not supposed to be undone, they are too short and the unblocking process causes much worse stress than just having them wait the block out. Plus, if someone can't wait a week without editing Bulbapedia, then they would need a wikibreak anyway, because the person would obviously be obsessed. MaverickNate 01:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- im going to jump in here and support this. not only is a 2hr block pretty negligible in the long run, but as Mav says, it is part of the blocking policy that small cooldown blocks can not be appealed. -- MAGNEDETH 02:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Wait!!!
I found out why I have so many user talk edits! Often times, I would go on the user creation log and welcome the users that had not been welcome yet. There was this one time me and Diamaster welcomed hundreds...and we got in trouble by Zhen Lin. I was wondering why I had so many edits on the user talk space...I never considered welcoming as part of it.--☆Tavisource 03:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I was looking through the Links on your User Page.....
and the Conversative pedia made me Laugh out Loud.Over and over again.It paints such a nasty picture of us lieralsI was almost tempted to make an account on it JUST to vandalise the site.Thanks for making my day--DCM((Nag at Me!Edits))
- Here's what I've been thinking. Make an account on there, edit constantly until I get promoted to Bureaucrat status, change all the other administrators/bureaucrats rights to none so no one can block me, lock the database so only I can edit (as I'm the only bureaucrat), and delete every single page on there. Like, PWNage! Yeah, I wouldn't do that though. And you have no need to be scared about me doing that on here, since I sincerely like Pokémon and am a prominent TCG player, so I'd get hunted down and shot. Also, if I were gonna do that on here, I would've done it already. Thanks for the feedback, though. :D --ニョロトノ666 02:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ive actually made a plan to do so on Bulbapedia also. It would be easy to pretend to be a Conservative. Just mock those who are athiest, Liberal, Gay, Or anything that you personally dont find correct, and youll be an admin--DCM((Nag at Me!Edits))
- the flamingdeathcockofdoom is one of the funniest things i've seen in a long time--RexRacer -talk 03:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- How do you find this stuff?--DCM((Nag at Me!Edits)) 03:23, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- the flamingdeathcockofdoom is one of the funniest things i've seen in a long time--RexRacer -talk 03:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ive actually made a plan to do so on Bulbapedia also. It would be easy to pretend to be a Conservative. Just mock those who are athiest, Liberal, Gay, Or anything that you personally dont find correct, and youll be an admin--DCM((Nag at Me!Edits))
Necessary?
Was it necessary to block Al Gore? Are we not allowed to have political figures as our user names? --ケンジのガール 02:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the argument that "we're not Wikipedia" can be made here, as it has many times before, but on there, it's not allowed to impersonate a celebrity or corporation under any circumstances. And no, that user is not Al Gore. I'll add it to our userpolicy now, so there can be no doubt on the matter. --ニョロトノ666 02:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- I know, he's not, but don't forget that there's always a small possibility of that happening....it might happen once ever thousand years...and that once could be anytime....just saying.-0☆Tavisource 02:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well there is that user named Mileycyrus. Aren't they impersonating Miley Cyrus? How come he's not blocked? Well he is blocked but for a different reason. --ケンジのガール 03:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- I know, he's not, but don't forget that there's always a small possibility of that happening....it might happen once ever thousand years...and that once could be anytime....just saying.-0☆Tavisource 02:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the argument that "we're not Wikipedia" can be made here, as it has many times before, but on there, it's not allowed to impersonate a celebrity or corporation under any circumstances. And no, that user is not Al Gore. I'll add it to our userpolicy now, so there can be no doubt on the matter. --ニョロトノ666 02:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Ash's Chikorita
Do u like the new pic? I thought it would match another pic of a a Johto starter capture.--KukiTalk 18:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
I didn't mean to double post. The Edit Conflict thing was supposed to show, but it didn't, so instead, it created another copy...computer error, not mine.--☆Tavisource 01:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. I do it sometimes, too. --ニョロトノ666 01:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if you got my comment before, but I found out the reason why I have WAY more talk page edits than main space....I don't have much mainspace contribs, because I just didn't contribute greatly, but I have alot of Talk page edits because TWICE, I was bored, so I went to the user creation log and welcomed as many people as I could for hours...I never considered that as talk page editing when you talked about it...but now I know...I was wondering why I had so many edits.--☆Tavisource 01:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Nominations for admistratorship
I think that your idea of only admins voting on whether or not a user becomes an admin is a really good one.--RexRacer -talk 01:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
No that defeats the whole purpose of the Users having in a say in whos an admin, I campaigned for this so hard even risked getting a ban, so that we, the users, would have a say in whos an admin --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Well, what about users being able to nominate people, but only the admins voting?--RexRacer -talk 20:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Like I said
Paperfairy got the e-mails. Talk to him MaverickNate 21:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
My talk archive
Don't forget to remove the {{Protect}}
template from it. Chocolate 00:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
U still gotta unprotect my main talkpages--KukiTalk 00:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Template:World Championships
Perhaps this would serve a better purpose? I know it'd be more useful and more relevant to Project Decks than the other one. Also, I don't have the time to put together articles for the five remaining decks from 2005 and 2006 as I've got a lot on my plate over the next few weeks, but I'm planning to put together deck lists for those five decks, as I have the booklets that came with the decks. Once I've compiled those lists, who would I give them to? Cipher (Talk) 12:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Pokémon cloning
You can't override consensus without discussion. Consensus is clear, from the many edits that were made to improve on the description of the edits, including those by the current head admin himself. Bring it up on the talk page first. I won't revert again for now, as that would be edit warring, but I will put the issue on the talk page. --Raijinili 21:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Links
Why should something be linked more than once on a page? Chocolate 00:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Let's see... first off, what if someone just looks at one section of the page without reading the rest? There's a plethora of other reasons, but that's the most obvious and I have neither the desire nor the time to list the rest. --ニョロトノ666 00:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey
I'm not going to start a stupid discussion about it, so take a look for yourself here. hfc2X 02:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ja, the general consensus is to keep Bulbapedia a wiki and not a stategy guide. That guy's already lost the argument. --ニョロトノ666 02:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Three people after half a day is not consensus. I don't care about whether or not the cheats should be on the page. I care that everyone before you two thought that the cheats belonged on the page, and you just ignored them. A wiki can't work like that. --Raijinili 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- He meant consensus as everyone else on the wiki because this has been discussed before. In other words, it has been voted down and it will not be going up ever. MaverickNate 03:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- This is a recurring problem that I run into: If you're going to claim that something's been discussed before, please provide a link. --Raijinili 03:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- He meant consensus as everyone else on the wiki because this has been discussed before. In other words, it has been voted down and it will not be going up ever. MaverickNate 03:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Three people after half a day is not consensus. I don't care about whether or not the cheats should be on the page. I care that everyone before you two thought that the cheats belonged on the page, and you just ignored them. A wiki can't work like that. --Raijinili 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Please leave bulbapedia if you don't like the consensus. keep Bulbapedia a wiki and not a stategy guide. hfc2X 04:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- You're reading too much into this. Where's the discussion in which consensus was decided? Why can't you show it to me? --Raijinili 04:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's not necessary. Enough discussion. WE ARE A WIKI, not ING or other cheat pages. Understood? Also.. you're discussing on an Admin's page if you haven't realized, and if he reverted your reversion to my edits, then you should think it over. hfc2X 04:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- As I said already, I don't care about the cheats. I only care about whether or not this change was made with consensus, something you people seem to think isn't necessary to prove to me because you have already decided that I'm wrong. --Raijinili 05:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's not necessary. Enough discussion. WE ARE A WIKI, not ING or other cheat pages. Understood? Also.. you're discussing on an Admin's page if you haven't realized, and if he reverted your reversion to my edits, then you should think it over. hfc2X 04:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Yo
I'd like to speak with you on the internets. Could you get on AIM please? -Sketch 18:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Template:User Had YouTube Account
Why did you delete it? Chocolate 18:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Too few people would use it to justify it a place in the Template namespace. --ニョロトノ666 18:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- But "too few people" isn't the same as "no people". Chocolate 18:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- If not that many people use it..it's a waste of space. -Sketch 18:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- But I was using it. Chocolate 18:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Only you using it falls under Too Few. -Sketch 18:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- But I was using it. Chocolate 18:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- If not that many people use it..it's a waste of space. -Sketch 18:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- But "too few people" isn't the same as "no people". Chocolate 18:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- If I may throw in my 2¢ here, I personally think the tag should have been moved to the userspace, and then the ensuing redirect be deleted. I'd only outright delete a usertag in very extreme cases; most of the time, I'd move first and then erase the redirect.
- I've went ahead and recreated the template in question at User:Chocolate/Had YouTube Account. This is where I would have moved the original tag had I had the chance. --Shiningpikablu252 20:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
...since I was cut off
I wanted you to know that they might not be the same if you wanted to add some eventually. MaverickNate 23:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Allowing Insults?
I removed DCM's comment as it was an offensive insult towards me, are you saying that you tolerate this kind of behaviour, Im allowed to remove vandalisng offensive messages --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
I will now have to take the matter to a higher authority if you cant perform your admin duties properly, I shall be asking Ttechidna about the comment that was made, and as you havent resolved the issue,im going to have to tell him that an offencive and hateful comment towards me was restored and by who --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Um... --ニョロトノ666 23:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dude,. he just blocked DCM. Give him a break. --((Marton imos)) 23:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the above comment it was a bit stong, may I please remove the comment DCM made form the talk page as I always believed you were allowed to revert vandalism and/or insults, but you added it back in so I am a little confused as to the policy? Shouldnt the insult be removed? --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Dude,. he just blocked DCM. Give him a break. --((Marton imos)) 23:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Ugh.
You seem to still be on (and TTE's protected his pages), so I'll ask you first. What do you think? If I was supposed to give them a warning, then it seems like I'd better unblock them. --((Marton imos)) 23:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep the block. You did well. Kuki needs to learn his lesson to not get involved in image reversion wars, as do the others. --ニョロトノ666 23:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Me Again (Sorry)
The warning on my talkpage? Personally I dont fell I have been on talking on User talk: that much, the talk space about articles yes, but mostly thats improvement, and when I do use the User talk: space its about clearing up policies as I find some of them quite confusing, and just want to be a good contributor. So can you tell me how to prevent further warnings? How many talk page edits are we allowed? --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- I doubt there are limits, but the thing is that you should just take it to the forums instead... ht14 23:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- There are limits. Talk abuse. --ニョロトノ666 00:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
HM09
I hear there's an (a?) HM09 in some sites such as [1] in Pokémon Crystal. Should we add this? ht14 23:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
dude...
uhhh, arnt talk pages for talking? why cant you talk all you want?--Darkrai breeda 00:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Talk abuse --ニョロトノ666 00:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Um...
Why did you undo my edit on the nominations for administratorship? Chocolate 00:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Because the previous version was correct. Don't argue this with me. Both TTE and I agree on that point, as can be evidenced from the page history. --ニョロトノ666 00:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
please
just take a look: Template:Wondercard hfc2X 17:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks. I forgot to delete that damn thing. --Maxim 17:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Good job
You totally owned BulbaBot. It's never getting its admin powers back, right? Chocolate 21:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Probably at some point. --ニョロトノ666 21:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Take away its rights again! It vandalized my user page and I can't revert it! Chocolate((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions)) 15:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Umm...did you see this? Chocolate((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions)) 19:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Take away its rights again! It vandalized my user page and I can't revert it! Chocolate((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions)) 15:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Template:TCG Expansions
Hiya, I've drafted a new version of this template which can be found in my sandbox. I don't want to implement it before I've gotten any opinions on it, so any thoughts you have on this would be much appreciated. Cheers, Cipher (Talk) 21:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
{{Project CharacterDex notice}}
First admin I saw. Do Gym Leaders and E4 members need this on their pages?--The Kkllnnator blastoise 21:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Template:User Random
Was it really all that necessary to delete it? Why not move just move to my name space? Chocolate 22:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Editing
Well, I usually buy one version of the video game releases when they are released in duos and then the third version is subsequently purchased, starting from 3rd generation. I own Sapphire, LeafGreen, Emerald, and Diamond as the RPGs (I'd like Platinum, too). My Mystery Dungeon choice was Blue, and then Explorers of Time. I started watching the anime in season one, but it wasn't possible for me to watch every single episode. From then on, I've watched my fair share of episodes in each season, each series. Oh, and I'd like to complete my movie collection someday; it'd be nice. What you can take and give to me as advice is baffling to me, but seeing as their is a good faith user here at hand, why not, right? Bulbapedian - Talk 23:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Protection
Can you protect the Raikou article? because lots of noobs keep changing it's name to Rai-kuu. hfc2X 05:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- I know on Wikipedia you can make a page protected only to new users. If you HAD to protect an entire Pokémon's article to begin with...--RexRacer -talk 05:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
ummmm ok
Emo-fairy 16:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Redirecting
Should the kanji for the Japanese names redirect to their respective articles? (e.g., redirecting バシャーモ to Blaziken, and redirecting しぜんのちから to Nature Power)--The Kkllnnator blastoise 21:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh shoot. I don't know... I'll ask TTE and get back to you. --ニョロトノ666 21:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- TTE likes the idea. Go for it. --ニョロトノ666 22:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunatly, I don't have the time today. maybe tomorrow.--The Kkllnnator blastoise 22:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
You've got e-mail
Chocolate((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions)) 22:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Pathetic, son. I went through a period when I disliked Pokémon a few years back, and now I'm trying to catch 'em all as avidly as ever. You'll come back. Trust me. --ニョロトノ666 22:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Help
Can u please fix Firebreather?--KukiTalk 00:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
The template for Generation II trainer classes is up in In the anime's face--KukiTalk 00:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- No it's not. That happens with some browsers. I don't think there's anything I can do, since it's your browser that's at fault; not the page itself. Maybe TTE can work it out... --ニョロトノ666 00:16, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Permission
Can I put the more recent pic of Lance's Dragonite on the page?--KukiTalk 01:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I may as well reply on your talk page too
No AIM. Only email and MSN. — THE TROM — 05:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, OK, I succumbed. Screen name is murrayjmiles. If that's not enough to find me with, let me know via email. And if you want to talk, let me know via email as well so I can come online. Otherwise you'll be left waiting for aaaaaaages coz it's not my primary IM. — THE TROM — 10:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Shipping
Should I add my new tag- {{fan speculation}}
to the top of all unconformed shipping articles?--RexRacer -talk 00:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- No. The very fact that they're shipping means that they're speculation. --ニョロトノ666 00:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Please...
You've been making too many edits to the User talk:
namespace lately. Please take your conversations to the forums, a chatroom, e-mail, an IM service, or something similar, as that many edits will slow down the server. --ニョロトノ666 01:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- You idiot! Read the message near the top of this page! I'm working behind the scenes! --ニョロトノ666 01:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
AIM
can you please come on Aim as soon as possible, I need to tell you something, and your the only one I can turn to. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Hahaha, why not me? Oh, wait! You don't like me. Carry on. But Poli doesn't come on for about 4-6 more hours if he comes on at all today. AIM doesn't work well on his computer. MaverickNate 19:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
No, I have always tried to be your friend, but you still hold a grudge from when I stole your table. So should I take this as a sign you no longer hate me? Can we be friends? If so, can we swap aim names and stuff. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- I have not been mad at you for months. And I actually forgot about you taking that table. I changed it enough times since then. But, coincidentally, my aim is on my table, so you can use it if you need to. Just drop a message. MaverickNate 19:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Ancient Mew card
Hey, I'm trying to improve this article and I noticed you seemed to now how to translate it (at least Psychic) how could you read it?--MisterE13 21:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I was mistaken. The move is "Psyche," and is confirmed by multiple sources. This is a rough translation. Lemme know if you need more than that. --ニョロトノ666 21:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
So...
According to Tavisource, you told Kuki that anime tables should have a <br> after a Pokémon's name if there is a note (such as (×2)) after it. But that stretches the table. See Monica for example. If you look at the ones that have a <br> after the Pokémon's name and then compare it to the ones that don't need a <br>, you'll see that they are not evenly lined up. Simply, why should we use <br>s if they make the tables un-even? Chocolate((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions)) 16:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dunno where I told Kuki that. If somebody could show me where I said that, that would be nice. In any case, you're right. We shouldn't use <br>s if they make the table uneven. --ニョロトノ666 00:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
¿Pokéteca en los Encyclopediæ Pokémonis?
Jioruji just told me that was there. Should we try to have them join? They only have like 300 Articles and it could help (them at least). I would like it, it could help me learn Spanish. --DialgaRULES 23:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)